Re: Gump work-in-progress (CleanUp branch)

2004-06-23 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> I've been struggling with Gump performance issues for months now. That is > 'clogs up' (on large workspaces) has continually hampered usage & (frankly) > my progress . One thing that I did find when I was doing performance analysis/tuning of the DOM-like (create a tree of objects then serialize

[Forrest Gump] Re: Gump work-in-progress (CleanUp branch)

2004-06-17 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
> Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > > At the same time the Forrest folk divided to do some major (copyless) work, > > and they removed the ability to pass work/site location parameters to the > > batch file. Gump used these. > > They will be back somehow, don't worry :-) No worries. As you said, we proba

Re: Gump work-in-progress (CleanUp branch)

2004-06-17 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: ... At the same time the Forrest folk divided to do some major (copyless) work, and they removed the ability to pass work/site location parameters to the batch file. Gump used these. They will be back somehow, don't worry :-) Since I've not managed to install Forrest into To

Gump work-in-progress (CleanUp branch)

2004-06-17 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
I've been struggling with Gump performance issues for months now. That is 'clogs up' (on large workspaces) has continually hampered usage & (frankly) my progress . I've turned over every rock that comes to my mind, but I keep failing. I've been getting pretty frustrated with Python (I find it some