On Feb 18, 2007, at 9:34 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So either:
* you update Mono to a release that does not yet contain this extra
* strict compiler behavior (1.2.0 or 1.2.1 should be ok)
this would be my preferred option. I don't
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So either:
* you update Mono to a release that does not yet contain this extra
* strict compiler behavior (1.2.0 or 1.2.1 should be ok)
this would be my preferred option. I don't think I'll find time to do
that before the next
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if Ant also does not require to bootstrap the version of
Ant that you want to build.
Ant bootstraps itself in Gump, yes. It does so using a shell script
that is part of the distribution.
Stefan
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general@gump.apache.org
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 6:36 AM
Subject: Re: Issue building NAnt
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if Ant also does not require to bootstrap
On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:14 PM, Gert Driesen wrote:
Is the NAnt build actually failing on that machine, or was the
build log I
got from Curt Arnold taken from another machine ?
The Gump that sends out mail is on another machine (VMGump), but NAnt
is also failing on Clarus:
-Original Message-
From: Sander Temme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 16 februari 2007 16:35
To: Gert Driesen
Cc: 'Gump code and data'
Subject: Re: Issue building NAnt
On Feb 15, 2007, at 11:14 PM, Gert Driesen wrote:
Is the NAnt build actually failing
On Feb 16, 2007, at 10:30 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:46 AM, Gert Driesen wrote:
You either need a more recent version of Mono, or I could modify
NAnt to
allow it to compile on that version of Mono. I don't know if you'd
consider
using a nightly build (or any
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 16 februari 2007 21:54
To: Gump code and data
Subject: Re: Issue building NAnt
On Feb 16, 2007, at 10:30 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:46 AM, Gert Driesen wrote:
You either
On Feb 16, 2007, at 3:42 PM, Gert Driesen wrote:
Looking at the code that fails on Mono, it looks like the problem is
that Mono is detected as supporting .NET 2 but is missing a framework
method expected to be there.
NAnt by default targets that CLR on which its running, and it by
default
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:09 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
However, if you try to do nant or nant test, you will get a
failure that exec doesn't support the managed attribute. It
appears that the build file for NAnt requires features that are not
in NAnt 0.85. Removing the managed=true replaces
-Original Message-
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: zaterdag 17 februari 2007 6:20
To: Gump code and data
Subject: Re: Issue building NAnt
On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:09 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
However, if you try to do nant or nant test, you will get a
failure
On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Gert Driesen wrote:
Would it possible to send me the output of the following commands
on the gump machine:
$ pkg-config --modversion mono
$ pkg-config --variable=prefix mono
$ pkg-config --variable=libdir mono
$ which mono
On clarus.apache.org. (an Xserve
-Original Message-
From: Sander Temme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 16 februari 2007 7:45
To: Gump code and data; Gert Driesen
Subject: Re: Issue building NAnt
On Feb 15, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Gert Driesen wrote:
Would it possible to send me the output
13 matches
Mail list logo
