Hi Adam,
this is a good idea, my experience with gump is also that the updates
are taking ages.
Cheers,
Antoine
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
I took a break from the studying I ought be doing, in order to tinker with
multi-threading. Heck, I've suffered all this pain w/ Python (my own doing,
no doubt)
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
The 'risk' with this change that we are running fair chunks of code
simultaneously (currently) the few places the code could overlap (the run
lists) are not synchronized (since Python has no such concept on objects,
locks are separate). I think we are pretty lucky with
I took a break from the studying I ought be doing, in order to tinker with
multi-threading. Heck, I've suffered all this pain w/ Python (my own doing,
no doubt) so I might as well get some fun out of it. I like the results.
Since cvs|svn|whatever are typically network latency/IO bound, there is
