quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
Subject: Re: Where to go with Gump?
From: adam.j...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 16:08:43 -0600
On 2013-05-21, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
I hesitate to reply since I've not contributed in quite some time (and
yes, that is some *significant* British understatement. ;-)
But your input is still appreciated, don't worry.
That said, the fact that the burden of metadata maintenance has been
on
Hi Martin,
I'm not sure I fully understand what you are trying to say.
On 2013-05-20, Martin Gainty wrote:
Am i the only advocate to converting gump to java?
Gump used to be written in a mix of Java, XSLT and bash. It has been
reimplemented in Python - partly in the hope to attract more
On 2013-05-19, Sander Temme wrote:
Yes, this makes it seem that we are performing a thankless task.
Perhaps the right question to ask is who here at the Gump PMC is using
its facilities to good effect, since we constitute the minimum viable
community to keep it going.
It's not easy for me to
Stefan et al,
I hesitate to reply since I've not contributed in quite some time (and yes,
that is some *significant* British understatement. ;-)
As somebody who found them self sucked away from Gump, I want to express my
appreciation (and admiration) for all the Gump efforts over the years.
On May 19, 2013, at 8:22 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
In January I turned off nagging and nobody ever asked why the nag mails
stopped. I saw Sebb mention it on Commons' dev list but not because
anybody had asked for it. Even the Ant folks (including myself) who
used to
Hi Stephan
If gump does go fubar then we would need to find an alternate means to supply
build.sysclasspath to quote Ant folk
In Ant's caseGump set's Ant's build.sysclasspath to only and manages
the system classpath
the fact that it builds APR (which is a dependency of Apache HTTPD)
