> Sorry for not understanding how nagging works, and perhaps the intent
already
> exists, but shouldn't a Gump instance have a "Concern Area", i.e. "Nag
> projects that have 'these' domains in the nag-address" ? And by default
only
> use the domain-name on the host it is running.
Nagging works for
On Friday 18 June 2004 23:30, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> Nagging is both a command line parameter (--notify) and has to be
> requested/enabled in the workspace (with reworked the code, I managed to default the former to be true, and ignore
> the second. :(
Sorry for not understanding how nagging w
rds,
Adam
- Original Message -
From: "Martin van den Bemt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gump code and data" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: Stray nags (was:Re: [VOTE RESULTS] Retire Java Gump)
> Just to prevent myself fro
Just to prevent myself from spamming when I set up gump on my "new" box
(running fc 2)..
Mvgr,
Martin
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 17:30, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> > Is nagging on by default ?
> > If it is a config entry, it's probably best to have the nag only as a
> commandline parameter, to prevent "s
> Is nagging on by default ?
> If it is a config entry, it's probably best to have the nag only as a
commandline parameter, to prevent "spam" in the future ?
Nagging is both a command line parameter (--notify) and has to be
requested/enabled in the workspace (with
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 15:49, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
> 'CleanUp' branch (perhaps move it to SVN) or something. There is significant
> risk/change w/ this branch (as stray nags have shown) and it'd be a good
> time to rework directories, etc.
Is nagging on by default ?
If it is a config entry, it's
