On Sun, 23 May 2004, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've added a new project that builds the code (from it's new
location) and added that as a dependency to the struts projects.
The attachment didn't make it to the list (neither did your beanutils
patch). I think you should
On 24 May 2004, at 08:44, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2004, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've added a new project that builds the code (from it's new
location) and added that as a dependency to the struts projects.
The attachment didn't make it to the list (neither did
in that case, i'll need some karma, please.
To Gump CVS? You ought have it, ever Apache committer ought be a Gump
committer.
[Sorry if I am mis-understanding, just w/ e-mails multi-hour lag today I
figured I'd response ASAP.]
regards
Adam
On 24 May 2004, at 19:44, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
in that case, i'll need some karma, please.
To Gump CVS? You ought have it, ever Apache committer ought be a Gump
committer.
i did another checkout and i do now indeed have karma :)
(maybe i checked it out anonymously before...)
- robert
the struts gump failures (the ones before the recent commons logging
problem anyway) appear to have been caused by changes in the way that
digester releases are packaged. an example digester application that
digests RSS feeds have been moved out of the core distribution.
i've added a new
