> I think you're spot on that gump basically needs to change to support the
> maven model of one-jar-per-project-definition.
great!
> In fact making it
> one-output-per-project-definition seems to make even more sense, where a
> "maven dist" is a different project from a "maven jar".
I'm not so
On 08-01-2005 03:46, "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/gump/MavenId
Kewl!
> Any thoughts on what the best path is?
As I've said before, I think some fundamental changes to gump are in order
so that it really understands maven and fits the maven project model (whi
Hi,
http://wiki.apache.org/gump/MavenId
I've started a list of known incompatibilities (by no means
incomplete), listed my understanding of the problem, and potential
solutions.
Essentially, the core of the problem is that gump descriptors use the
definition of a project inconsistently. eg. asm
