Finally Gump got through to the end of the food chain
and built our base project for Forrest - yippee!
Now our next failure is forrest-test ...
---
BUILD FAILED
...
/home/gump/workspaces2/public/workspace/forrest/main/targets/plugins.xml:243:
Could not create task or type of type: for.
We do have a entry for "ant-contrib" which provides
that "for" task, but Gump does not seem to pick it up.
Is our descriptor missing something, e.g. a nested entry for
the or something? Sorry, i cannot figure it out.
ant-contrib recently removed the "for" task from the antcontrib.properties
file
Peter Janes wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >We do have a entry for "ant-contrib" which provides
> >that "for" task, but Gump does not seem to pick it up.
> >
> >Is our descriptor missing something, e.g. a nested entry for
> >the or something? Sorry, i cannot figure it out.
>
> ant-contrib rece
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005, Peter Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The way to fix the build is to use namespacing,
one way, not *the* way.
The other way is to use the xml descriptor instead of the properties
file as resource in the taskdef.
Stefan
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005, Peter Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The way to fix the build is to use namespacing,
one way, not *the* way.
The other way is to use the xml descriptor instead of the properties
file as resource in the taskdef.
Ah, I should have left it to the Ant master
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Peter Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005, Peter Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>The way to fix the build is to use namespacing,
>> one way, not *the* way. The other way is to use the xml descriptor
>> instead of the propertie
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Peter Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, I should have left it to the Ant master instead of being all
clever-like. :)
Did I sound like that? I hope not.
No no, no slight taken... I was just privately pleased with myself that I'd
come up with a minimal
