Re: maven, gump, developer effort

2004-10-08 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Leo Simons wrote: Disclaimer: it has been weeks/months since I last looked into all this. Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: But the *most* serious concern is that we seem to have no way to build with Maven and, due to excalibur, this is holding up basically 15 percent of our projects (including, yes, you

Re: maven, gump, developer effort

2004-10-07 Thread Peter Janes
Leo Simons wrote: I will assert that the most serious concern with gump is that it is too hard to use, understand or improve for non-gump-gurus. If this were a componay and I were the boss, the first thing I would tell people to work on is a much more readable and enticing website. Ie "What is G

Re: maven, gump, developer effort (was: Re: [status] main issues)

2004-10-07 Thread Brett Porter
> I will assert that maven is the root problem (no offense intended to the > maven people, I'm rather happy with maven recently otherwise). Maven is No offense taken :) However, I don't think Maven itself is the problem - as Adam has said, building works fine until we get to conflicting dependency

maven, gump, developer effort (was: Re: [status] main issues)

2004-10-07 Thread Leo Simons
Disclaimer: it has been weeks/months since I last looked into all this. Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: But the *most* serious concern is that we seem to have no way to build with Maven and, due to excalibur, this is holding up basically 15 percent of our projects (including, yes, you guessed right, coc