Re: rack awareness help

2010-03-19 Thread Mag Gam
Thanks everyone. I think everyone can agree that this part of the documentation is lacking for hadoop. Can someone please provide be a use case, for example: #server 1 Input script.sh Output rack01 #server 2 Input script.sh Output rack02 Is this how its supposed to work? I am bad with

Re: rack awareness help

2010-03-19 Thread Allen Wittenauer
On 3/19/10 4:32 AM, Mag Gam magaw...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks everyone. I think everyone can agree that this part of the documentation is lacking for hadoop. Can someone please provide be a use case, for example: #server 1 Input script.sh Output rack01 #server 2 Input script.sh

0.21 Release

2010-03-19 Thread Jeremy Davis
Could someone clarify the position on the 0.21 release? This thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201002.mbox/dfe484f01002161412h8bc953axee2a73d81a234...@mail.gmail.com kind of died out (it seems) without any resolution. I saw two suggestions: Rebase 0.21 against

Re: 0.21 Release

2010-03-19 Thread Stack
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Jeremy Davis jerda...@speakeasy.net wrote: ...and I also saw release 0.21 as is with stack as the release manager. Was there a final decision on this off list? On the above, I was toying with the idea of being release manager for releasing as hadoop 0.21.0 what

Re: 0.21 Release

2010-03-19 Thread Todd Lipcon
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Jeremy Davis jerda...@speakeasy.netwrote: Thank you for your reply, So what would be your (or anyones) advice on getting, HDFS sync/flush/append functionality? You seem to indicate that 0.21 branch as is might not be the best idea, with your preference