Could not obtain block blk_

2010-05-07 Thread Pierre ANCELOT
Hello, we're having some issues with this... Any idea please? 2010-05-07 05:59:46,998 INFO org.apache.hadoop.metrics.jvm.JvmMetrics: Cannot initialize JVM Metrics with processName=MAP, sessionId= - already initialized 2010-05-07 05:59:54,846 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSClient: Could not obtain

Re: Could not obtain block blk_

2010-05-07 Thread Allen Wittenauer
On May 7, 2010, at 3:32 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: Pierre ANCELOT wrote: All my nodes are up, I can get the file through the DFS client... 0.20.2 OK, that's interesting. Try looking at the replication count and upping it, or copying the file to make sure its all there. Or running fsck

Hadoop support for hbase

2010-05-07 Thread Dhruba Borthakur
Hi folks, I would like to open a discussion on how we can make HBase work well with a supported/released version of Hadoop. HBase currently ships with a hadoop jar and that hadoop jar is from hadoop 0.20 + a set of ten/twenty patches. Most of these patches are focussed on HDFS append support in

Re: Hadoop support for hbase

2010-05-07 Thread Todd Lipcon
I have a few questions about this proposal: 1) Will we open new JIRAs separately for each change we want to commit, and go through the normal review process? Currently the 20-append work has been mostly going on under HDFS-142 for whatever reason, with ancillary issues only for bugs that also

Re: Hadoop support for hbase

2010-05-07 Thread Doug Cutting
On 05/07/2010 10:57 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: 1) Will we open new JIRAs separately for each change we want to commit, and go through the normal review process? Currently the 20-append work has been mostly going on under HDFS-142 for whatever reason, with ancillary issues only for bugs that also