On Oct 21, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Tom White wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
I suggest we make this stronger.
By way of comparison, the recently enacted bylaws for Pig
(http://pig.apache.org/bylaws.html) have consensus, for example.
Consensus is
On Oct 21, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
- The packaging is Linux specific, we've gotten push back when trying
to contribute modifications upstream with Linuxisms since Apache
supports non-Linux platforms (namely Solaris).
Oh come now Eli. Just say it: I push everyone really
On 21/10/10 22:53, Ian Holsman wrote:
yep.. I've heard it's a source of contention...
but I'd like to see how we can get it so the amount of patches that the
large companies apply on top of the current production apache release gets
minimized, and the large installations are all running nearly
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ian Holsman had...@holsman.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Milind A Bhandarkar
mili...@yahoo-inc.comwrote:
but the other question I have which hopefully you guys can answer is does
the yahoo distribution have ALL the patches from the trunk on
+1 for moving to 0.22 trunk.
Thanks
mahadev
On 10/22/10 3:03 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
+1 on moving forward to common 0.22 trunk. 0.20 was dragging on for quite a
long time and, in a sense, create certain imbalance toward 0.20-centric
Hadoop environment
On Fri, Oct
I think we should push forward to 0.22 as well.
The question then becomes what should be in it.
2010/10/22 Mahadev Konar maha...@yahoo-inc.com
+1 for moving to 0.22 trunk.
Thanks
mahadev
On 10/22/10 3:03 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
+1 on moving forward to common 0.22
On Oct 22, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
I think we should push forward to 0.22 as well.
As Well ? That means there is something else you want to do, right ?
What is it ?
You have said in earlier emails that Yahoo distribution of hadoop not being
the same as apache hadoop trunk will
