On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 19:43, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 2011, at 4:43 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
We have the very unfortunate situation here at Hadoop where Apache
Hadoop is not the primary and foremost place of Hadoop development.
Instead, code is developed
I need extend ArrayWritable ??? like this :
public class IntArrayWritable extends ArrayWritable { public
IntArrayWritable() { super(IntWritable.class); } }
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Harsh J qwertyman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Alessandro Binhara
Well put Allen.
My thinking is to move this API into HDFS removing the need for HDFS proxy.
Then you can use the http proxy of your choice if you have needs for a proxy
(we do this for external bandwidth management, security and ip space
preservation reasons).
I'm +1 for removing it.
We
Aaron,
Thanks for following up on this issue for us.
Has dfs.datanode.du.pct been depreciated?
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Aaron T. Myers a...@cloudera.com wrote:
Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1564
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011
Hi Bernd,
Apache Hadoop is about scale. Most clusters will always be small, but Hadoop is
going mainstream precisely because it scales to huge data and cluster sizes.
There are lots of systems that work well on 10 node clusters. People select
Hadoop because they are confident that as their
Hi Eric,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 13:46, Eric Baldeschwieler eri...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hi Bernd,
Apache Hadoop is about scale. Most clusters will always be small, but Hadoop
is going mainstream precisely because it scales to huge data and cluster
sizes.
There are lots of systems that
I am the co-author (with Gianluigi Zanetti) of HADOOP-6369 -- add Grid
Engine support to HOD. At CRS4 we've been using (our patched version of)
HOD since 2008 and we still use it in production. We use Hadoop 0.20.2
since it was released one year ago.
Simone
On 02/12/11 06:15, Owen O'Malley
On Feb 18, 2011, at 2:11 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
I don't know how many Y-employees are working on H internally. Only
the contributors can sort that out.
Did Carol Bartz run over your puppy or something? You don't appear to
realize that pretty much all the major companies that
Please keep user questions on mapreduce-user as per http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html
.
On Feb 18, 2011, at 2:42 AM, Alessandro Binhara wrote:
I need extend ArrayWritable ??? like this :
public class IntArrayWritable extends ArrayWritable { public
IntArrayWritable() {
On Feb 18, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I feel PDF discourages collaboration. Either plain text or HTML would
permit folks to more easily provide feedback, either as patches or as
alternate drafts.
Ok, I've upload the latex files.
-- Owen
I am unsure why this is being discussed on general. I havent seen any
contributor to ignore request for source of the design document. If
someone wants to edit or submit a new one, just commenting on the jira
and asking for it should be enough. no?
thanks
mahadev
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:12 AM,
Hi Mag,
Per http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html, general@ is not the best
place for this discussion. Let's continue this on the actual JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1564
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Mag Gam
On 2/18/11 8:24 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@apache.org wrote:
On 17/02/2011 18:36, Eric Yang wrote:
I think the bigger concern is that Hadoop ecosystem does not have a standard
method in linking dependencies. Hbase depends on Zookeeper, and Pig depends
on Hadoop and Hbase. Then pig
On 02/18/2011 09:12 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
Ok, I've upload the latex files.
Thanks, Owen!
Doug
On 02/18/2011 09:48 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
I am unsure why this is being discussed on general.
I feel this is an issue of general interest and wanted to find out how
others felt about it, not just those following those two particular
issues. Over the years, on several projects, I've expressed
FYI, Owen's design doc for HADOOP-6255 is also available in xml format in the
proposed patch. I think as long as there is a mean to edit/revise the design
doc, it should be fine right?
Regards,
Eric
On 2/18/11 10:39 AM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/18/2011 09:48 AM, Mahadev
On 02/18/2011 11:09 AM, Eric Yang wrote:
FYI, Owen's design doc for HADOOP-6255 is also available in xml
format in the proposed patch. I think as long as there is a mean to
edit/revise the design doc, it should be fine right?
Yes, that looks great to me. I am just proposing that, when a
On 18.02.11 17:11, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Feb 18, 2011, at 2:11 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
I don't know how many Y-employees are working on H internally. Only
the contributors can sort that out.
Did Carol Bartz run over your puppy or something?
Something, definitively. I assume EOR.
The editable proposal is good advice. It would be nice to present both
editable version and read-only version to track the history of the proposal.
If it comes down to streamline efficiency, having editable proposal is
preferred. Hence, I will use editable document next time.
Regards,
Eric
On
19 matches
Mail list logo
