On 21/06/2011 19:40, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
On 18/06/2011 21:22, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
olutely no reason that trunk cannot be packaged for release
tomorrow as 0.23. There may be many reasons why it won't pass a release
vote, but we probably
I agree with this.
We need to find a middle ground that achieves three aims:
1) Makes it clear that an ASF release of Hadoop is THE APACHE HADOOP. Jeff's
manpower argument actually reinforces this. We need a very testable definition
of what is an Apache Hadoop Release or enforcement will be
On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
I haven't even heard of anyone who owns up to moving to ext4 fs underneath.
Yes you do.
:D
Problems have been reported with Hadoop, the 64-bit JVM and Compressed
Object References (the -XX:+UseCompressedOops option), so use of that
option is discouraged.
I think the above is dated. It also lacks critical information. What JVM
and OS version was the problem seen?
CompressedOops had
On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Scott Carey wrote:
Problems have been reported with Hadoop, the 64-bit JVM and Compressed
Object References (the -XX:+UseCompressedOops option), so use of that
option is discouraged.
I think the above is dated. It also lacks critical information. What JVM
and
On 6/22/11 1:49 PM, Allen Wittenauer a...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 22, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Scott Carey wrote:
Problems have been reported with Hadoop, the 64-bit JVM and Compressed
Object References (the -XX:+UseCompressedOops option), so use of that
option is discouraged.
I think the
