Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond

2011-06-23 Thread Eric Baldeschwieler
Yup. Frequent releases, some focused on getting to stable on older code lines, some pushing new code out for people to try. On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: On 18/06/2011 21:22, Roy T. Fielding wrote: olutely no reason

Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond

2011-06-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 22/06/2011 17:27, Allen Wittenauer wrote: On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: I haven't even heard of anyone who owns up to moving to ext4 fs underneath. Yes you do. :D Did it work? and RHEL6.0?

Re: Hadoop Java Versions

2011-06-23 Thread Steve Loughran
On 22/06/2011 21:27, Scott Carey wrote: Problems have been reported with Hadoop, the 64-bit JVM and Compressed Object References (the -XX:+UseCompressedOops option), so use of that option is discouraged. I think the above is dated. It also lacks critical information. What JVM and OS version

Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond

2011-06-23 Thread Allen Wittenauer
On Jun 23, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: On 22/06/2011 17:27, Allen Wittenauer wrote: On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: I haven't even heard of anyone who owns up to moving to ext4 fs underneath. Yes you do. :D Did it work? and RHEL6.0?