Yup. Frequent releases, some focused on getting to stable on older code lines,
some pushing new code out for people to try.
On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
On 18/06/2011 21:22, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
olutely no reason
On 22/06/2011 17:27, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
I haven't even heard of anyone who owns up to moving to ext4 fs underneath.
Yes you do.
:D
Did it work?
and RHEL6.0?
On 22/06/2011 21:27, Scott Carey wrote:
Problems have been reported with Hadoop, the 64-bit JVM and Compressed
Object References (the -XX:+UseCompressedOops option), so use of that
option is discouraged.
I think the above is dated. It also lacks critical information. What JVM
and OS version
On Jun 23, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
On 22/06/2011 17:27, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
I haven't even heard of anyone who owns up to moving to ext4 fs underneath.
Yes you do.
:D
Did it work?
and RHEL6.0?