Eric,
It would take the same amount of resources to fix 0.22 as to merge
append and security branches aka 0.20.205.
Although I understand that Hortonworks needs to support its
customer(s) and is eager to bridge the gap in functionality with its
competitor(s), I think continuing with 0.20
Hi all,
Over the past week a number of people have provided input for patches they
would like to see in 205, with reasons and risk evaluations; please
see the threads
Content request for 0.20.205 Sustaining Release and
Add Append-HBase support in upcoming 20.205.
Thanks to all who took the effort
On Sep 6, 2011, at 2:08 PM, milind.bhandar...@emc.com wrote:
I am very interested in hearing what the community thinks about this
issue. I believe what happens here has long-term consequences.
AKAIK, the bylaws do not mention anything about abandoning release. If
past is any indication,
Hi there,
Current situation:
3 slaves with each two 320GB disks in RAID 1. All the disks show high read
errors and io throughput has gone below 5Mb/s without running any hadoop
job. (It looks like it will fall apart soon...)
What is the best way to replace the bad disks? I may be able to add
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your quick reply.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Segel, Mike mse...@navteq.com wrote:
Hi,
Ok, so you have a small cluster w raid drives...
First, raid isn't really a good idea.
You want to replace the old raid drives w new 2TB drives in JBOD.
(Which is better.)
Hi Konstantine,
I've never advocated 21 or 22 since I've never been able to volunteer
help to work on them.
I think it's great if you want to run another branch, do testing etc.
But given that it's neither complete, stable nor the latest majority
supported project I think the expectation should
Konstantin,
On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:04 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
I think continuing with 0.20
a-three-years-old-technology is not the best place to invest
resources. In the past you advocated for 0.21 and 0.22, both now
abandoned by your team(s) in favor of enhancing 0.20. It will be sad
On Sep 7, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Marco Cadetg wrote:
Current situation:
3 slaves with each two 320GB disks in RAID 1. All the disks show high read
errors and io throughput has gone below 5Mb/s without running any hadoop
job. (It looks like it will fall apart soon...)
One the special
On Sep 7, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
Using real data helps - from Apache Jira, here are the statistics for work on
trunk/hadoop-0.23 in Q3 of 2011 (i.e. last 2 months alone):
Hadoop Common - 224 resolved* jiras
Hadoop HDFS - 153 resolved* jiras
Hadoop MapReduce - 161* resolved
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:04AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
Eric,
It would take the same amount of resources to fix 0.22 as to merge
append and security branches aka 0.20.205.
Although I understand that Hortonworks needs to support its
customer(s) and is eager to bridge the gap in
10 matches
Mail list logo