On 06/10/2011 17:49, milind.bhandar...@emc.com wrote:
Steve,
Summary: I'm not sure that HDFS is the right FS in this world, as it
contains a lot of assumptions about system stability and HDD persistence
that aren't valid any more. With the ability to plug in new placers you
could do tricks like
Steve,
>
>you can improve Hadoop to make it more agile; my defunct Hadoop
>lifecycle branch did a lot of that, but you have to have everyone else
>using Hadoop to be willing to let the changes go in -and those changes
>mustn't impose a cost or risk to the physical cluster model.
Until Hadoop 0.
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:17AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 17:49, milind.bhandar...@emc.com wrote:
>> Steve,
>>
>>> Summary: I'm not sure that HDFS is the right FS in this world, as it
>>> contains a lot of assumptions about system stability and HDD persistence
>>> that aren't valid any
Hi Folks,
While I have seen the wiki on which java versions to use currently to run
Hadoop, I have not seen any discussion about the roadmap of java version
compatibility with future hadoop versions.
Recently, Oracle retired the "Operating System Distributor License for
Java" (DLJ) [http://robila
