Yes, you are right, according to Hadoop bylaws.
http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html#Decision+Making
--Konstantin
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Konstantin Shvachko
> wrote:
>> Ok. The vote will run till Saturday.
>
> That is, of cour
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Konstantin Shvachko
wrote:
> Ok. The vote will run till Saturday.
That is, of course, fine.
The question that I have is a different one: is my understanding of the
process correct and THE ONLY thing that could potentially affect the
outcome here is a lot of -1 PM
Ok. The vote will run till Saturday.
Thanks,
--Konstantin
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Konstantin Shvachko
> wrote:
>> Owen,
>>
>> Could you please clarify. Do you mean the vote should ran 3 more days
>> or can be closed now?
>
> I'm s
Seems like a good idea.
We do want powered by submission to be as low friction as possible. Can we do
a form -> jira or something, so we grant access and add their content on one
submission?
Any thoughts?
---
E14 - typing on glass
On Dec 6, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> the
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Konstantin Shvachko
wrote:
> Owen,
>
> Could you please clarify. Do you mean the vote should ran 3 more days
> or can be closed now?
I'm saying that since you regenerated the tarball (md5's don't match),
the vote should run 3 more days.
-- Owen
Owen,
Could you please clarify. Do you mean the vote should ran 3 more days
or can be closed now?
As mentioned earlier the file hadoop-0.22.0.tar.gz was regenerated
last Saturday due to a trivial change in the packaging script. The
Hadoop sources in it remained unchanged.
Please advise.
Thanks,
-
SomeOtherAccount is a committer and has done some great work on
cleaning up the wikis.
-- Owen
Steve.
I happen to contributing to Hadoop too from time to time ;)
Please make sure that my name is added to the correct list.
Wiki account is KonstantinIBoudnik
Thanks,
Cos
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:39AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> the Hadoop wiki has been collecting a lot of spam links
+1 - everything seems correct.
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 05:48PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
> I updated the artifacts.
> --Konstantin
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Konstantin Shvachko
> wrote:
> > Roman,
> >
> > Thanks for finding this.
> > The change is actually in the assemble script in B
Thanks for the correction Owen - that makes sense
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 09:13AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > I am sure things like that are controlled by projects' bylaws that's why
> > there's nothing specific at the apache level about
Thanks for the correction Owen - that makes sense.
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 09:13AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > I am sure things like that are controlled by projects' bylaws that's why
> > there's nothing specific at the apache level about
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>> I am sure things like that are controlled by projects' bylaws that's why
>> there's nothing specific at the apache level about that.
>
> The vote is required to be on a source tarb
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> I am sure things like that are controlled by projects' bylaws that's why
> there's nothing specific at the apache level about that.
The vote is required to be on a source tarball. Generated artifacts
and subversion tags may be provided
the Hadoop wiki has been collecting a lot of spam links, usually on the
front page or PoweredBy; these are clearly the high ranking
destinations. Keeping these links under control is a waste of effort.
I propose locking down the wiki at http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop so that
before a user can
14 matches
Mail list logo
