Done updating the site. Changes should be visible in some time.
@Arun,
Haven't done the jdiffs. Dunno how to do in the maven world.
Haven't done the mvn publish stuff too. If you haven't already, please
also make sure that the mvn jars are published with the correct version.
Thanks,
+Vinod
With 7 +1s (4 binding), one -0 and one -1 (0 binding), the vote passes.
Thanks to all who voted, I'll push out the release.
Arun
On Feb 17, 2012, at 11:23 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
I've created another release candidate for hadoop-0.23.1 that I would like to
release.
It is available at:
Updating the release bits now.
+Vinod
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
With 7 +1s (4 binding), one -0 and one -1 (0 binding), the vote passes.
Thanks to all who voted, I'll push out the release.
Arun
On Feb 17, 2012, at 11:23 PM, Arun C Murthy
+1
Checked signatures and checksums, also ran a few jobs successfully on
a small cluster via https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-391.
Re: HDFS-2991 - how about adding a release note warning about it?
Tom
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've
I checked this RC, based on the same check-list as RC1:
- Signatures, message digests, the top level full LICENSE.txt,
NOTICE.txt and README.txt for both the source and binary artifacts are
all good. CHANGES.txt for common, hdfs and mapped are correctly
located like before.
- Able to build the
Verified the checksums.
Built from source, deployed a single node non-secure cluster. Ran several
jobs - with the Fifo and CapacityScheduler which completed successfully.
+1
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created another release candidate for
+1
I built it from source, and ran a job on a single node cluster. I did not run
any of the unit tests as this is still alpha quality.
--Bobby Evans
On 2/18/12 1:23 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created another release candidate for hadoop-0.23.1 that I would like to
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created another release candidate for hadoop-0.23.1 that I would like to
release.
It is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-0.23.1-rc2/
The hadoop-0.23.1-rc2 svn tag:
-1, unfortunately. HDFS-2991 is a blocker regression introduced in
0.23.1. See the JIRA for instructions on how to reproduce on the rc2
build.
-Todd
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created another release candidate for hadoop-0.23.1 that I would
Roman,
you are compiling on 64 bit machines?
not only make it impossible to build the right version
of container executor without hand-editing the pom.xml,
The idea was to have 32 bit binary all the time, can you let us know
what issue you are facing. During the build itself?
but also make
Todd,
From your analysis at HDFS-2991, looks like this was there in 0.23
too. Also, seems this happens only at scale, and only (paraphrasing
you) when the file is reopened for append on an exact block
boundary.
Agree it is a critical fix, but given above, can we proceed along with
0.23.1?
Hey Arun,
I think HADOOP-8105 is also worth another RC. It's an incompatible
change that breaks a bunch of the Hive 0.8 tests.
Thanks,
Eli
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created another release candidate for hadoop-0.23.1 that I would like to
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Roman,
you are compiling on 64 bit machines?
I'm compiling on both 32bit and 64bit architectures.
not only make it impossible to build the right version
of container executor without hand-editing the
Hey Arun,
Looks like this has already been fixed, apologies for the noise!
Thanks,
Eli
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Eli Collins e...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hey Arun,
I think HADOOP-8105 is also worth another RC. It's an incompatible
change that breaks a bunch of the Hive 0.8 tests.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Todd,
From your analysis at HDFS-2991, looks like this was there in 0.23
too. Also, seems this happens only at scale, and only (paraphrasing
you) when the file is reopened for append on an exact block
On Feb 23, 2012, at 10:30 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
Alright, consider me -0, though it's pretty nasty once you run into
it. The only way I could start my NN again without losing data was to
recompile with the fix in place.
Thanks Todd.
I'm thinking 23.1 has stewed long enough that we can get
+1 to that. I'd really like to see 0.23.1 get out sooner than later.
0.23.1 is a huge improvement over 0.23.0 and would really like to see
folks starting to play around with it!
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Arun C Murthy
+1
I downloaded and checked this rc, some of the things I checked:
- release notes are present both binary and src
- html documentation present in binary: share/doc/hadoop/index.html
- release is present at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/hadoop/hadoo
+1.
Downloaded the release. Set up a single node non secure cluster. Ran
a couple of example jobs on it. Looking forward to getting it out to
our users.
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Thomas Graves tgra...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
+1
I
I've created another release candidate for hadoop-0.23.1 that I would like to
release.
It is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-0.23.1-rc2/
The hadoop-0.23.1-rc2 svn tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-0.23.1-rc2
The maven artifacts for
20 matches
Mail list logo
