Proposal: Further Project Split(s)

2011-04-01 Thread Aaron T. Myers
Hello Hadoop Community, Given the tremendous positive feedback we've all had regarding the HDFS, MapReduce, and Common project split, I'd like to propose we take the next step and further separate the existing projects. I propose we begin by splitting the MapReduce project into separate Map and

Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s)

2011-04-01 Thread Todd Lipcon
+4.01. This is a terrific idea. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Aaron T. Myers a...@cloudera.com wrote: Hello Hadoop Community, Given the tremendous positive feedback we've all had regarding the HDFS, MapReduce, and Common project split, I'd like to propose we take the next step and further

Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s)

2011-04-01 Thread Chris Douglas
Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should explore speculative project splits. For this, a Hadoop.next() project should track the development of a project scheduler that can partition the Hadoop subprojects,

Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s)

2011-04-01 Thread Nigel Daley
-1+2. This could potentially allow us to replace Jenkins with Hadoop for our build and test infrastructure. That would be awesome! n. On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to partition our projects for more active

Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s)

2011-04-01 Thread Patrick Angeles
+1 This will allow Hadoop to better compete with GoDaddy's Hadoop Killer skunkworks project. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Nigel Daley nda...@mac.com wrote: -1+2. This could potentially allow us to replace Jenkins with Hadoop for our build and test infrastructure. That would be awesome!

Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s)

2011-04-01 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
LOL@Chris!!! On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should explore speculative project splits. For this, a Hadoop.next() project should track the development

Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s)

2011-04-01 Thread Brian Bockelman
On Apr 1, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not only need to partition our projects for more active releases, but we also should explore speculative project splits. For this, a

Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s)

2011-04-01 Thread Amr Awadallah
Strong -1 from me, this *idiotic* since we first need to split the NN and DN into separate projects. -- amr On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Allen Wittenauer awittena...@linkedin.comwrote: On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: Experience developing Hadoop has shown that we not

Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s)

2011-04-01 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 08:26, Nigel Daley nda...@mac.com wrote: -1+2.  This could potentially allow us to replace Jenkins with Hadoop for our build and test infrastructure.  That would be awesome! Has anyone checked a calendar lately? On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:57 AM, Chris Douglas wrote:

Re: Proposal: Further Project Split(s)

2011-04-01 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
And I tend to believe to all sort of stuff on this particular day because this happens to be my birthday ;( On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:35, Allen Wittenauer a...@apache.org wrote: On Apr 1, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 08:26, Nigel Daley nda...@mac.com