[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Is the incubator team is ready for that or is there something else I'm missing?
I think that we all are in general agreement, but haven't yet seen a
formal VOTE on it, ir I've just simply missed it.
KenC, whaddayathink?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:10:21 -0700
"Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The wiki pages would already be committed to cvs if I were not already
> waiting for you to have access to do it yourself. I'll just assume
> you won't mind having karma on incubator and add you to avail...Done.
>
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
>> Is the incubator team is ready for that or is there something else I'm missing?
>
> I think that we all are in general agreement, but haven't yet seen a
> formal VOTE on it, ir I've just simply missed it.
>
> KenC, whaddayathink?
i'
Roy,
With thanks. Will take this approach. Was not sure if you all wanted
the incubator to run by these rules given its slightly different focus
for documentation.
One caveat - at some point the actual policy document is (I would
assume) going to require a vote of the Incubator PMC.
Cheers,
Howdy,
Is there and archive somewhere about the formation of the incubator? Is
it all in mailing list archives or in CVS possibly? And who is on the
PMC as it's not noted on the "who we are" page as far as I can tell.
I'm just interested in the process.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> Is there and archive somewhere about the formation of the incubator? Is
> it all in mailing list archives or in CVS possibly? And who is on the
> PMC as it's not noted on the "who we are" page as far as I can tell.
the board minutes from last september or october; the res
With thanks. Will take this approach. Was not sure if you all wanted
the incubator to run by these rules given its slightly different focus
for documentation.
One caveat - at some point the actual policy document is (I would
assume) going to require a vote of the Incubator PMC.
CTR is a vote
