Yes. However, if you want to have more audience, I suggest that
you also post an announcement on freshmeat.net.
I had the impression that specific members of this list were waiting on
the source code to be made available. I hadn't really intended on doing
a very public announcement like on Freshm
Matt Liotta wrote:
I didn't see a reply from anyone in regard to my message below. Just
curious if the interested parties have seen it.
Yes. However, if you want to have more audience, I suggest that
you also post an announcement on freshmeat.net.
Jochen
-
I didn't see a reply from anyone in regard to my message below. Just
curious if the interested parties have seen it.
Matt Liotta
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
On Jan 4, 2004, at 11:03 PM, Matt Liotta wrote:
From reading this list's archives it looks like I missed a couple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sander Striker writes:
>On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 06:34, Justin Mason wrote:
>> Rodent of Unusual Size writes:
>> >o All projects under incubation must use a STATUS file (or a
>> > status.xml file if the project prefers XML) that contains
>> >
On Thursday 08 January 2004 09:05 CET Sander Striker wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 06:34, Justin Mason wrote:
> > BTW, I'm curious, but these links no longer seem to work :(
>
> Works for me.
I also had problems accessing eyebrowse from my university today (it just
timed out). From home everythi
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
What is it we are voting access for here? Is it to the overall
logging project repository? To a CVS module for the log4net code that
is to be created?
I am inclined to create a new CVS module for log4net and for each
sub-project. If a log4-X committer wants to commit a pat
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 06:34, Justin Mason wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Rodent of Unusual Size writes:
> >o All projects under incubation must use a STATUS file (or a
> > status.xml file if the project prefers XML) that contains
> > information the P
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2004 07:47, Leo Simons wrote:
Do we require a PMC vote on that as well? If so, should that vote occur
before or after the initial import?
My proposal is that we do a combined vote at the Avalon PMC;
* Acceptance of this codebase
with
* Andreas as a co
