At 01:18 AM 1/11/2004 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Also - is log4net being directly imported or is it going through the
incubator? My understanding would be the latter given it's bringing
new developers in, but my guess would be that it would be fairly
simple if the license issues
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
At 11:49 AM 1/12/2004 +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
...
From what I understand so far, I can't see any advantages for *log4net*
to come through the Incubator instead of LS.
http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html#does_project_X_really_need_Incubation
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
From what I understand so far, I can't see any advantages for *log4net*
to come through the Incubator instead of LS.
http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html#does_project_X_really_need_Incubation
http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html#can_Incubation_be_skipped
Incubation is not intended to be difficult. The Incubator's raison d'être
is to make sure that projects are imported, while ensuring that important
details have been observed.
Yes, I can see this. Also, I am sure that such projects can also choose
another way if there are appropriate Less
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Incubation is not intended to be difficult. The Incubator's raison d'être
is to make sure that projects are imported, while ensuring that important
details have been observed.
Yes, I can see this. Also, I am sure that such projects can also choose
another way if
Hi guys,
Can we go back to friendly replies again?
The thread 'Re: [VOTE] Granting committer status to log4net developers'
is starting to sound a lot more hostile that it has to be.
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
So, like I said, I clearly missed what you suggested as fixes to the
problems that you perceive. While I'm sure that this discussion belongs
on the incubator list, rather than here, I have a strong suspicion that
you're going to respond with a note to the effect that you've already
been
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
So, like I said, I clearly missed what you suggested as fixes to the
problems that you perceive. While I'm sure that this discussion belongs
on the incubator list, rather than here, I have a strong suspicion that
you're going to respond with a
Hello folks,
This is what i have been thinking about. For long.
Committership in specified duration.
For example, Log4XXX (New Project) needs some
committers in order to improve the quality of the
codebases rapidly and reliably, it seems.
(Patching, patching ... would dampen
