RE: Releasing Lenya 1.2

2004-06-10 Thread Rolf Kulemann
On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 04:41, Noel J. Bergman wrote: as far as I know you two are the official mentors of Apache Lenya. Can one of you please answer this question regarding the release of Lenya 1.2 ? After the vote we have to do many more things like doing the incubator request. It

please update incubator info

2004-06-10 Thread Leo Simons
Hi gang! someone still needs to go in and update the details related to geronimo in the incubator cvs module. cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: please update incubator info

2004-06-10 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Jun 10, 2004, at 6:52 AM, Leo Simons wrote: Hi gang! someone still needs to go in and update the details related to geronimo in the incubator cvs module. Thx. I'll take care of it. geir cheers, - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[RT] incubation time

2004-06-10 Thread Leo Simons
Hi gang! Some Stats -- Taking a look at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ we have 12 projects under incubation (listed as 13 but geronimo info needs updating). Of these, 6 projects, namely AltRMI FtpServer Lenya Depot WSRP4J XMLBeans have been incubating for 6 months

Re: Releasing Lenya 1.2

2004-06-10 Thread Gregor J. Rothfuss
Leo Simons wrote: Which translates to Stefano and Nicola agree this is a good thing, lenya peeps ask for release endorsement vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED]. IMV, releases are kind-of discouraged. Why are you not talking about exiting incubation? Lenya's been here for a year now, hasn't it? i took a

Re: [RT] incubation time

2004-06-10 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Leo Simons wrote: Hi gang! Some Stats -- Taking a look at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ we have 12 projects under incubation (listed as 13 but geronimo info needs updating). FtpServer incubation is not going well, as it has IMHO completely failed to incubate, as it has only

Re: [RT] incubation time

2004-06-10 Thread Alex Karasulu
Hey guys, You guys mind giving your opinions/impressions wrt the status of the directory project which has been in incubation for I believe 7 months now? Directory is slated for a TLP with 6 sub projects and she's big in terms of code base. We currently have a highly active community of 3

Re: [RT] incubation time

2004-06-10 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Alex Karasulu wrote: Hey guys, You guys mind giving your opinions/impressions wrt the status of the directory project which has been in incubation for I believe 7 months now? ... Our only limitation currently is a dependency on Snacc4J which we plan to eliminate within a months time thanks to

Re: [RT] incubation time

2004-06-10 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 11:21, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Alex Karasulu wrote: Hey guys, You guys mind giving your opinions/impressions wrt the status of the directory project which has been in incubation for I believe 7 months now? ... Our only limitation currently is a

RE: proposal

2004-06-10 Thread Robert McIntosh
In short, Torque is more of a top down approach where you start with a definition then generate the database and object model. OJB seems a little more transparent, but follows the OO API paradigm by implementing ODMG and JDO specs. Chameleon could, in theory, ride on top of OJB, sending it OQL