Re: XMLBeans PMC has voted to sponsor xmlbeanscxx

Or worse yet .. ex em el beans suxx ;-). Sanjiva. On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 16:35 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Good, because I first thought ex em el beans ch :D geir On Jul 12, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote: -Original Message- From: Heidi Buelow

Re: Commons CSV

On 14-07-2005 04:30, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/11/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) How much of the Incubator process would apply to Commons? All of it. Many of the exit conditions are automatically passed just by being a part of Commons.

Incubator projects lacking disclaimers?

The Incubator policy page is very clear that: 'Podlings are, by definition, not yet fully accepted as part of the Apache Software Foundation. Podling web sites MUST include a clear disclaimer on their website and in all documentation stating that they are in incubation.'

Re: Incubator projects lacking disclaimers?

And, I'd thought Beehive had that -- apologies that it's not on the website; I'll get that corrected this morning. At least it's on the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/beehive/ :) Thanks for pointing it out. Eddie Daniel John Debrunner wrote: The Incubator policy page is very

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Beehive into a TLP

Thank you, Craig! We're really looking forward to being part of the wider Apache community. At some point I'd love for us to figure out how page flows and Shale constructs can play nicely with each other. Rich Craig McClanahan wrote: +1 (Incubator Project Mentor) The Beehive folks have

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Beehive into a TLP

Didn't mean to fill everyone's inbox with this message, although I *am* excited for Beehive to be a fully-integrated part of the Apache community. Apologies for that spam (and this spam). Rich Rich Feit wrote: Thank you, Craig! We're really looking forward to being part of the wider

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Beehive into a TLP

On 7/12/05, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Incubator PMC, I believe Beehive is ready to function as a standalone PMC. Please see the latest status at: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html Could someone please provide information on any patents

Roller status (was Re: **** QUARTERLY REPORTS DUE ****)

Here's a summary of Roller status: Development status - Work is proceeding on Roller 2.0, which will be ready in August. The main (and possibly only) new feature of Roller 2.0 will be group blogging support -- this is a big feature and requires a very large number of changes to the code base

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Beehive into a TLP

Beehive doesn't currently have any implementations of the WS-* standards, including WS-Security -- the intent was to at some point look to other Apache projects that were implementing those standards (I don't subscribe to legal-discuss, but I presume the discussion in question is wrt WSS4J?). On

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Beehive into a TLP

Yes the current discussion on legal-discuss is wrt wss4j, but the question for beehive was more general: are there any patents that have been explicitly granted for the use of Beehive? For example, have BEA issued any licenses to Apache with respect to stuff that Beehive implements? Regards,

[proposal] Oscar OSGi Project

Hello, The OSGi community at large, several Apache committers and members would like to start a new project based on the existing Oscar OSGi Container which Richard Hall is graciously willing to donate. Without further commentary we present to you the proposal for the Oscar project:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Beehive into a TLP

On Jul 14, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Simon Kitching wrote: Yes the current discussion on legal-discuss is wrt wss4j, but the question for beehive was more general: are there any patents that have been explicitly granted for the use of Beehive? This is not how the question should be asked. The

Re: [proposal] Oscar OSGi Project

Here's my +1 -- dims On 7/14/05, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, The OSGi community at large, several Apache committers and members would like to start a new project based on the existing Oscar OSGi Container which Richard Hall is graciously willing to donate. Without

Re: [proposal] Oscar OSGi Project

Oh btw the turnout for this is so massive we're getting a trickle of supporters daily and adding them to the document. Perhaps we can get a wiki up soon and the dev lists. For the time being here's the document in subversion:

Re: [proposal] Oscar OSGi Project

On Friday 15 July 2005 10:07, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Here's my +1 My non-binding, big +1 as well. Cheers Niclas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]