Henri Yandell wrote:
> I did a bit of Incubator generation a week or so ago.
>
> Forrest was a problem, but only in that it was a bump I had to get
> over and so I put it off for a week. When I actually attacked the
> problem with momentum, the Forrest part was quite enjoyable. Only
> problem is t
Hello all,
My name is Terry Smith and I am new to this mailing list. I have a project
on the go and would like to know what the general application/interface
guidelines are for interfacing with the Apache project. Specifically, I am
designed a module for extreme uses of DHTML and dynamic applicati
Ah ok perfect. Thanks for the clarification!
Sanjiva.
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 11:05 +1100, Brett Porter wrote:
> As I understand it, everything has to go past the incubator, however
> as this code meets all the criteria for clearing incubation (IP is
> clean, no community concerns) it doesn't need
Apologies, I was mirroring the language from the checklist. This
covers everyone that has ever committed to it.
Cheers,
Brett
On 11/7/05, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both these statements mention that all *active* committers have a CLA
> on file. What about IP from non-active commit
Both these statements mention that all *active* committers have a CLA
on file. What about IP from non-active committers?
On 11/7/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Maven community has voted to consolidate by bringing two related
> codebases into the main Maven project.
>
> B
I did a bit of Incubator generation a week or so ago.
Forrest was a problem, but only in that it was a bump I had to get
over and so I put it off for a week. When I actually attacked the
problem with momentum, the Forrest part was quite enjoyable. Only
problem is that you have to know to go look i
As I understand it to.
Change "All new code donations has to come through the Incubator" to
"The Incubator needs to be aware of all new code donations entering
Apache".
Hen
On 11/6/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I understand it, everything has to go past the incubator, however
As I understand it, everything has to go past the incubator, however
as this code meets all the criteria for clearing incubation (IP is
clean, no community concerns) it doesn't need to stay there as long as
everyone is satisfied with the below.
- Brett
On 11/7/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROT
So I'm confused .. I was under the impression that *all* new code coming
into the ASF had to come thru the incubator and go thru incubation?
Maybe there's an exception if the code was written by ASF committers
under AL v2 but simply done elsewhere? Would appreciate clarification.
Sanjiva.
On Sun,
+1 from me.
On 11/6/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Maven community has voted to consolidate by bringing two related
> codebases into the main Maven project.
>
> Below are the IP clearance forms for each project. My understanding is
> that neither need to be incubated on
Hi,
The Maven community has voted to consolidate by bringing two related
codebases into the main Maven project.
Below are the IP clearance forms for each project. My understanding is
that neither need to be incubated on this basis. Please let me know if
this is not the case.
Project: Surefire
De
11 matches
Mail list logo
