Tuscany Proposal
0. Rationale
Recent years have seen the introduction of a variety of specifications,
frameworks and products (both commercial and open source) that have
focused strongly on ease-of-development for enterprise applications by
reducing the complexity for a typical application devel
Incubate Tuscany SOA project
Key: INCUBATOR-8
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-8
Project: Incubator
Type: Wish
Reporter: Kenneth Tam
Placeholder for materials related to Tuscany SOA incubator proposal.
--
This m
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-8?page=all ]
Jeremy Boynes updated INCUBATOR-8:
--
Attachment: Tuscany-apache-proposal.tar.gz
Example of seed code for Java implementation - actual contribution to be
uploaded on acceptance of proposal acc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-8?page=all ]
Jeremy Boynes updated INCUBATOR-8:
--
Attachment: tuscany_cpp.tar.gz
Example of seed code for C++ implementation - actual contribution to be
uploaded on acceptance of proposal accompanied by f
Jeremy,
How does this proposal fit with other ESB/SOA projects currently underway at
the ASF? At first glance, there appears to be overlap, so I am wondering if
there a plan / opportunity to merge them.
--- Noel
-
To u
Hi Noel,
(I worked with Jeremy on the proposal, and this seems like a good
place to chime in)
If by "merge", you mean consolidate the projects organizationally, we
debated approaching e.g. the WS PMC with this first but decided that
it ultimately make more sense to just come to the incubator and
speaking for myself, we'd be glad to make tuscany part of the WS
family. If you wish, we can have a vote on the PMC list. just let us
know.
thx,
dims
On 11/30/05, Kenneth Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
> (I worked with Jeremy on the proposal, and this seems like a good
> place to chi
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> How does this proposal fit with other ESB/SOA projects currently underway at
> the ASF? At first glance, there appears to be overlap, so I am wondering if
> there a plan / opportunity to merge them.
>
We are looking forward to close collaboration with other projects at t
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> speaking for myself, we'd be glad to make tuscany part of the WS
> family. If you wish, we can have a vote on the PMC list. just let us
> know.
>
> thx,
> dims
>
> On 11/30/05, Kenneth Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Hi Noel,
>>
>>(I worked with Jeremy on the proposa
As much as I would enjoy seeing two umbrella projects duel over
an amorphous set of marketing terms invented by IBM, I think the
ASF should be developing products, not architectural styles.
Although, calling SOA an architectural style would imply that it has
some constraints -- does anyone know wh
Great! i will start a VOTE on ws pmc list.
thanks,
dims
On 11/30/05, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > speaking for myself, we'd be glad to make tuscany part of the WS
> > family. If you wish, we can have a vote on the PMC list. just let us
> > know.
> >
> > t
Roy,
As i understand it, the concrete proposal is to implement this specification:
http://download.boulder.ibm.com/ibmdl/pub/software/dw/specs/ws-sca/SCA_ClientAndImplementationModelforJava_V09.pdf
I think a first cut using Tomcat and Apache Axis (Java) will be the
best bet in making a 1.0 releas
Quick question - Is the project going to be a JBI (JSR 208)
implementation?
Cheers,
Ias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is the project going to be a JBI (JSR 208) implementation?
Oddly, IBM is conspicuous by its surprising absence from that JSR's expert
group.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
IIRC, IBM was part of that EG, but left it.
geir
On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is the project going to be a JBI (JSR 208) implementation?
Oddly, IBM is conspicuous by its surprising absence from that JSR's
expert
group.
--- Noel
--
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=JBI+IBM+BEA :)
On 11/30/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is the project going to be a JBI (JSR 208) implementation?
>
> Oddly, IBM is conspicuous by its surprising absence from that JSR's expert
> group.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
>
Changshin Lee wrote:
> Quick question - Is the project going to be a JBI (JSR 208)
> implementation?
>
The design of the code we are contributing is intended to support
multiple container models. At this time there is an implementation of a
very simple Java container but some experiments have be
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-11-24 00:30:24 -0500 (Thu, 24 Nov 2005) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
I'd like to ask incubator if we in Apache Harmony can have a solaris
zone to use for build and test automation.
Will the PMC support a podling asking for such a resource?
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
