[Fwded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/9/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Wiki - we should follow up with Geronimo and Infrastructure
> regarding Confluence install @apache (Geronimo pushed for Confluence
> install, but AFAIK there was no resolution yet). Switching to
> MoinMoin i
On 3/9/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe we should subscribe all apache mail lists to one google account
> and figure out how to have a web site proxy searches into it...
You'd think Google would be enthusiastic to support this -- right now,
there's a zillion of us all indiv
On 3/9/06, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know that mailing-lists are part of the foundation of the ASF and
> are a really useful way to communicate effectively. However my feeling
> is that we don't have the right tools or policies to use them as
> effectively as could be. For examp
Echoing robert...
inline
Matthieu Riou wrote:
One of thing things that the we need to look at is how to improve
communication across projects. Perhaps having some ontological mailing
lists would be part of a solution.
What ideas and views do others have?
I know that mailing-lists are part o
Bill Dudney wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> Ah yes I was not thinking in terms of the whole site just in terms of
> adding new podlings.
>
> I like what you wrote better than what I had for sure, how about this
> additional verbiage though;
>
> Add new documents in the site-author directory, then do '
On 3/9/06, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One of thing things that the we need to look at is how to improve
> > communication across projects. Perhaps having some ontological mailing
> > lists would be part of a solution.
> >
> > What ideas and views do others have?
>
> I know that m
Hi Jean,
Ah yes I was not thinking in terms of the whole site just in terms of
adding new podlings.
I like what you wrote better than what I had for sure, how about this
additional verbiage though;
Add new documents in the site-author directory, then do 'svn add'.
If your new document
On 3/9/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Craig McClanahan wrote:
> >
> >>My understanding of the incubator process is that the Incubator PMC still
> >>has to vote to accept a podling
> >
> > No. Although some people have expressed a desire that it be othe
> One of thing things that the we need to look at is how to improve
> communication across projects. Perhaps having some ontological mailing
> lists would be part of a solution.
>
> What ideas and views do others have?
I know that mailing-lists are part of the foundation of the ASF and
are a real
Hi, Bill,
Actually, I think this change might eliminate some valid info:
> Add new documents in the site-author directory, then do 'svn add'.
> - Add a new entry to the menu structure by editing
> - site-author/stylesheets/project.xml
> + Also, add an entry
Definitely, yes.
Sorry for the omission.
We'll update that.
regards,
Martin
On 3/9/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/9/06, Raphaël Luta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK. I really think you should update to proposal to include the complete
> > initial committer list, incl
Bill Dudney wrote:
> Thanks again Jean,
>
> I've checked in everything and updated the site so hopefully I did it
> right this time :-)
>
> I also updated the guides/website.xml file because it referenced the
> 'stylesheets/project.xml' document which is not how projects are
> migrated to any
Andy Clark wrote:
> Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitters says that a new
>> acccount request should be sent to root, but not until the CLA has been
>> recorded. If you verified that the CLAs have been recorded, and unless
>> anyone knows otherwise, my guess
Replace migrated with 'referred' in that last email on this thread...
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 9, 2006, at 11:33 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
migrated
Thanks again Jean,
I've checked in everything and updated the site so hopefully I did it
right this time :-)
I also updated the guides/website.xml file because it referenced the
'stylesheets/project.xml' document which is not how projects are
migrated to any more.
Also, everyone's CLA
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitters says that a new
acccount request should be sent to root, but not until the CLA has been
recorded. If you verified that the CLAs have been recorded, and unless
anyone knows otherwise, my guess is the volunteers that create ne
On 3/9/06, Raphaël Luta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK. I really think you should update to proposal to include the complete
> initial committer list, including any current MyFaces (or other existing)
> committers that wish to participate in ADF.
Yes, that's mandatory. Most [EMAIL PROTECTED] don
Andy Clark wrote:
> I've made requests to create accounts for the initial
> committers of the Kabuki incubator project[1]. But I
> have yet to hear anything come from that. All of the
> proposed committers have submitted their contributor
> agreements and I've formally issued the requests for
> new
I've made requests to create accounts for the initial
committers of the Kabuki incubator project[1]. But I
have yet to hear anything come from that. All of the
proposed committers have submitted their contributor
agreements and I've formally issued the requests for
new accounts to both [EMAIL PROT
Bill Dudney wrote:
> Thanks Jean,
>
> Dooh! I was getting ahead of my self when I had a little time on my
> hands I'll put the xml file in shortly. Do I need to 'svn delete' the
> html file?
No need to delete the html file. The contents will get overwritten by
the new html that gets generated f
Thanks Jean,
Dooh! I was getting ahead of my self when I had a little time on my
hands I'll put the xml file in shortly. Do I need to 'svn delete' the
html file?
Sorry about that!
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - myfaces.apache.org
On Mar 9, 2006, at 9:20 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Bill,
Bill Dudney wrote:
> Hi Noel and All,
>
> Are we good to go then?
>
> The DB PMC has accepted us and we've not heard anything about an
> Incubator PMC vote so we'd like to get moving if possible.
>
> As I understand it our next step is to file all the JIRA issues with
> the fine folks over in
Bill,
The html files under site-publish/projects html get published from the
xml source files under site-author/projects.
You need to add site-author/projects/cayenne.xml. Let me know if you
need any help with this -- I'm happy to help.
-jean
Original Message
Subject: svn co
The mentors should be able to help in all these regards. While they
don't do all the work, they act as the intermediataries between the
incubator and the project. They likely have access to update svn auth
or know who does (the Lucene PMC chair, most likely), and they have
access to update the stat
Thanks Brett, couple more questions though. I'm very new to the incubation
process and have been reading everything I can find about project lifecycles
and such, but I'm a newbie nonetheless.
> has comments on 15 Jan and 19 Feb asking for an up to date status
file, which isn't here:
http://incub
Great! I've pushed out the binaries out to the maven repo.
http://cvs.apache.org/repository/incubator-activemq
Regards,
Hiram
On 3/8/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Huge thanks Ken! That makes it 3 +1s from Incubator PMC members and no -1s
> after nearly 3 weeks of voting so I
Hola,
I don't agree with everything you said, but I have faith. So I'm
going to let go of this topic for now (as I've said along, I didn't
and won't -1 anything at this stage), but I sure will be looking for
great test coverage and documentation from OpenJPA ;) Hopefully
something we can cite as
Yoav Shapira wrote:
So we agree that we allow the current proposed committer list as-is,
but when we look at graduation from the incubator we examine test case
and documentation as well as the product source code itself, because
by bringing these people in as committers through the incubator, t
the mailing request here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-655
has comments on 15 Jan and 19 Feb asking for an up to date status
file, which isn't here:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
Once that is in place, I'm sure it can be taken care of pretty quickly.
I wasn't abl
Hi Noel and All,
Are we good to go then?
The DB PMC has accepted us and we've not heard anything about an
Incubator PMC vote so we'd like to get moving if possible.
As I understand it our next step is to file all the JIRA issues with
the fine folks over in the infra project.
http://incub
Could I request a status on the Lucene.Net project? There was a request put
forth for a mailing list, svn access, etc. back in December 2005, but it is
not yet available.
Any information on the current status and what else is needed to move this
forward would be great.
cheers,
jeff r.
Manfred Geiler wrote:
> On 3/9/06, Raphaël Luta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Martin Marinschek wrote:
>>
>>>Hi *,
>>>
>>>Craig has already mentioned that there is the ADF faces proposal of a
>>>JSF component library donation to the ASF - we, the Apache MyFaces PMC
>>>would love to take this comp
On 3/9/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that if we acknowledge that a community as a group of peers, working
> towards a common goal, then that would derive umbrellas from projects where
> there are distinctions of authority (and therefor work) within that
> community's code
On 3/9/06, Raphaël Luta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > Hi *,
> >
> > Craig has already mentioned that there is the ADF faces proposal of a
> > JSF component library donation to the ASF - we, the Apache MyFaces PMC
> > would love to take this component set in.
> >
> > We h
Martin Marinschek wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> Craig has already mentioned that there is the ADF faces proposal of a
> JSF component library donation to the ASF - we, the Apache MyFaces PMC
> would love to take this component set in.
>
> We have already voted positively - does the incubator PMC according t
35 matches
Mail list logo
