Things like the README:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/axis2/trunk/c/axiom/README
Axiom/C was moved to a separate folder only recently, however it is
still part of Axis2/C
Here is a tutorial: http://ws.apache.org/axis2/c/docs/om_tutorial.html
Please try the tutorial with 0.91
+1 from me.
On 6/1/06, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me.
Paul
On 6/1/06, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This proposal seems to have generated a lot of geniune interest, so now
I'm calling for a vote for the Incubator to formally accept it.
A few editorial comments: at
Hi
Based on the feedback from Robert we have done the following changes:
1) Added a NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt in the binary and src distributions.
2) Added NOTICE and LICENSE to the meta-inf of the JAR
3) Put full info in the MANIFEST.MF
4) Renamed the ZIP files to
Hi,
+1 on accepting the proposal for incubation.
I am also interested in personally contributing to this project as a
committer, though I regretfully do not have the bandwidth to
effectively mentor this proposal. I hope the proposal team doesn't
mind that I've just added myself to the wiki as a
On 6/1/06, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Based on the feedback from Robert we have done the following changes:
1) Added a NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt in the binary and src distributions.
2) Added NOTICE and LICENSE to the meta-inf of the JAR
3) Put full info in the MANIFEST.MF
4)
On 6/1/06, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Champion: Sam Ruby
Mentors:
* Garrett Rooney
* Paul Querna
One more would be good :-). Perhaps you should volunteer -- you're
pretty good at it...and you'll be working on the stuff anyway...
Only as a last resort. ;-)
Robert
in general, i like this (but i tend to keep
them with the libraries) but there are some good reasons why a single
license file is recommended for apache releases (
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses).
Thanks. As Apache Synapse stabilises we
On 6/1/06, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes -- it's true that the policy is still only proposed and that the
proposed policy allows for a transition/evaluation period to see the
impact of some of the requirements.
I would not suggest that you remove something from the release just