sorry for the late reply..
David Crossley wrote:
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The use of e-mail as the primary means for communication is part of ASF
policy and philosophy, and we can certainly learn lessons from projects
that
have gone against it. IRC tends to breed
Recordon, David wrote:
It would be great if everyone could take another look at the Heraldry
proposal (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HeraldryIdentityProposal) now
that ApacheCon is over and we've worked to incorporate the feedback that
we've heard. Currently we have two mentors and are intere
Craig L Russell wrote:
I'd expect that new feature development is done only on the Apache line,
though I don't know how Apache can require that...
I would hope so. But the very nature of our license doesn't demand this.
I hope that all of the parties to this new effort bring their sincere e
I like it, however you might want to google "ibid software" and decide
if some confusion would result.
David Strauss wrote:
Recordon, David wrote:
>From conversations at ApacheCon, and gentle nudging at dinner last night from Danese Cooper, it
sounds like we should come up with a better name.
On 6/30/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/29/06, sophitia que <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 6. The Apache PRC SHALL affirmatively and publicly respond to any such
> > > inaccurate publicity surrounding podlings.
> >
> > I'm not quite comfortable with the word inaccur
I am interested in being a mentor for Heraldry.
Ted
On Jul 4, 2006, at 3:27 AM, Recordon, David wrote:
It would be great if everyone could take another look at the Heraldry
proposal (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
HeraldryIdentityProposal) now
that ApacheCon is over and we've worked to inc
It would be great if everyone could take another look at the Heraldry
proposal (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HeraldryIdentityProposal) now
that ApacheCon is over and we've worked to incorporate the feedback that
we've heard. Currently we have two mentors and are interested in having
a third if
Shesh...what makes you think it was done lightly? As the rest of my post
indicated I'd taken the time to downloaded and try out their release, even
pointed out a problem in the readme files I'd found. And I'd looked at
things like the notice and license files that have cased problems in other
incu
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 07:08:48PM +0100, ant elder wrote:
> A (non-binding) +1 from me to say thanks for the Tuscany votes.
Huh what? Exactly what semantics attach to a "+1" is always a muddy
discussion, but IMNSHO they really ought not be "thanks for something
unrelated". Its utterly confusing.