As is mine, I believe.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 8:18:36 AM
Subject: Re: [RESULT] -- [Vote] accept UIMA as a podling - #2
I didn't specify as such with my vote, but I believe my +1 was
Sorry, Leo, but I don't see the point of your message below making
statements about CXF that are wholly untrue.
First, CXF is corporate? That's incorrect, given that it's purely the
combination of two separate open source projects, Celtix and XFire.
Celtix was developed completely under the
In which case I apologies if I got the context wrong. Let's please
just collectively shake hands (hard to do via email I know) and agree
to buy each other some drinks if we ever catch up face-to-face.
All the best,
Mark.
On 6 Oct 2006, at 22:29, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
I believe you took my entire message out of its intended
context, which was the recent me/you/Leo/you minithread.
Most definitely not the entire looong discussion thread,
nor the overall topic with all the threads hanging from it.
Sorry if I wa
On 6 Oct 2006, at 21:34, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Little wrote:
1) ASF is a meritocracy.
And people learn by questioning, not by being passive observers!
Actually, I think that's patently false. You never learned
anything from a b
On 6 Oct 2006, at 21:08, Henri Yandell wrote:
Replying from the peanut gallery because the friction is getting
too high.
On 10/6/06, Mark Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6 Oct 2006, at 18:10, Leo Simons wrote:
>
> Erm.
>
> 1) ASF is a meritocracy.
And people learn by questioning, not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Little wrote:
>
>> 1) ASF is a meritocracy.
>
> And people learn by questioning, not by being passive observers!
Actually, I think that's patently false. You never learned
anything from a book? Or a lecture? Or a discussion?
And people gain
Replying from the peanut gallery because the friction is getting too high.
On 10/6/06, Mark Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6 Oct 2006, at 18:10, Leo Simons wrote:
>
> Erm.
>
> 1) ASF is a meritocracy.
And people learn by questioning, not by being passive observers!
Questioning is good.
On 6 Oct 06, at 9:38 AM 6 Oct 06, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 10/6/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the Proposer controls the Proposal (and not stick it on a
freely editable
Wiki), then isn't it very straight forward?
+1, although I think a Wiki still *should* work if the estab
On Oct 6, 2006, at 7:10 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
2) The mentors for CXF (well, until recently) have accumulated
loads of merit. Enough to be allowed to be mentors, and then some.
The guy you're disagreeing with has accumulated so much merit he
has difficulty passing through airport security (*
On 6 Oct 2006, at 18:10, Leo Simons wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Mark Little wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006, at 14:54, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Mark Little wrote:
On 4 Oct 2006, at 23:20, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
You will, of course, infer and interpret events as you choose.
It's pre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I did not like the idea of rebooting CXF because I think
> the CXF community would have lost an important
> "lessons-learned" opportunity...
IMHO, there's been a 'lessons-learned' opportunity
for the incubator, too.
- --
#ken
Just an update:
o Jason has stepped down as Mentor for CXF.
o The PPMC has been setup.
o Anyone who was supposed to get commit privs and did not
is being contacted to see if they still want it, and
if they say Yes, will receive it.
o If they also request to join the PPMC, they wil
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Mark Little wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006, at 14:54, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Mark Little wrote:
On 4 Oct 2006, at 23:20, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
You will, of course, infer and interpret events as you choose.
It's pretty obvious to me, a complete outsider, that t
On 10/7/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.logicblaze.com/ as it refers to "Apache ActiveMQ" with
mentioning it is under-going incubation.
Sorry for the typo...
s/with/without/
Niclas
Hi,
whoever is associated with LogicBlaze need to amend the posting on the
website
http://www.logicblaze.com/ as it refers to "Apache ActiveMQ" with mentioning
it is under-going incubation.
I am sure there are other references, such as
http://www.logicblaze.com/services.jsp in the same manner.
T
Hey Martijn,
do keep sending these e-mails. Less replies doesn't mean that its
less valuable.
On Oct 3, 2006, at 9:38 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Just to pose an outsider view, being new to the ASF and not to hijack
the discussion on the CFX/CeltiXFire, I would like to share my views
on the
On 10/6/06, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the Proposer controls the Proposal (and not stick it on a freely editable
Wiki), then isn't it very straight forward?
+1, although I think a Wiki still *should* work if the established
etiquette was not to make edits to someone else's pro
Comments in-line.
I will log these issues in jira and we will get them fixed.
Thanks, Edell.
-Original Message-
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 October 2006 22:02
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release
On 9/29/06, Mo
On Wednesday 04 October 2006 02:46, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> And then we've got Roy's comment that the Incubator PMC
> isn't equipped to make those decisions, so that leaves us with what?
This has been a long thread to go thru for someone absent for a while...
It has been very interesting. I unde
20 matches
Mail list logo
