Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 10:33, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Will you be satisfied with a vote on posting a snapshot?
I think some Incubator PMC member wants to see a 'full release' artifact for
review.
I don't.
The podling should select a release manager producing
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 14:07, Paul Querna wrote:
I believe in general, a release is a 'nice to have' for an incubator
project, and nothing more. It can help some groups who are not familiar
with what is required of a release, but by no means should it be a
requirement to graduate from
You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
produce a release such that I can throw the Tomcat jar at it, too?
Sure, it is a developer release, but it let's non-Harmony folks play
with your project.
Is there a specific problem with producing a developer release?
Cheers,
If there's no reason for us to change the project name, then I for one
would just like to keep the one we have. We have built some name
recognition around UIMA already, and I hope the Ukrainian Institute of
Modern Art will forgive us for usurping the #1 spot on Google ;-)
--Thilo
Mads
On Tuesday October 17 2006 10:33 pm, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
The early rule did not work, specifically for projects that intended
to graduate as a TLP. There was insufficient experience left in one
group post-graduation to properly create an Apache release, so we
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Legal ducks? this project has a flock :) And there is no requirement
for a release for graduation, is there? (Ironic, since the early rule
in the incubator was that no releases were allowed ;)
The early rule did not work, specifically for projects that intended
to
+1 (non-binding)
On 10/18/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 10/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC has voted to release a parent pom and buildtools jar
that are dependencies for a forthcoming M2 release. These
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:44:22PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
The PPMC of the Apache Harmony incubator podling has voted to ask for
graduation from the Apache Incubator. We have enjoyed our time here
with you, but feel that we don't want to overstay our welcome. We want
to do our part
On 10/18/06, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At ApacheCon, it was noticed that at the present time the number of
podlings exceeds the number of Apache projects (I believe the figures
quoted were 37 to 35).
I am of the opinion that the pendulum has swung too far - we seem to
have a number of
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:44:22PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
The PPMC of the Apache Harmony incubator podling has voted to ask for
graduation from the Apache Incubator. We have enjoyed our time here
with you, but feel that we don't want to overstay our welcome. We
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:10:37PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote:
On the surface everything appears fine to the point of graduating minus
the proving that you can do a release. But given past experiences with
graduating large projects too fast, I'd be much in favor of keeping
Harmony in incubation
Agreed. I don't think it is fair to be making up graduation
requirements right when a project is about to graduate. If we are to
require a project to go through an Incubation process, that process
should be well-defined and not constantly changing based on the whims
of Incubation members. That
On 10/9/06, Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there hasn't been any significant work on Lucene4c in quite some
time, I'd like to officially mark it as dormant so I don't have to
keep writing board reports that just say there has been no progress
in the last 3 months.
So, cast your
NOTE: I'm not subscribed to this list, so please copy me if you reply.
- o -
I've participated in more community building exercises that you can
count with your hands and I have *never* seen a community behave like
Harmony.
The effort of writing a JVM is no small
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 10/18/06, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At ApacheCon, it was noticed that at the present time the number of
podlings exceeds the number of Apache projects (I believe the figures
quoted were 37 to 35).
I am of the opinion that the pendulum has swung too far - we
Hi all,
I've just committed the clearance form for Mitosis here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/directory-mitosis.xml
The tar ball of the contribution which has a SHA1 checksum in the
document above has been made available here:
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Don Brown wrote:
Agreed. I don't think it is fair to be making up graduation
requirements right when a project is about to graduate.
The graduation requirement is that a majority of the PMC members
agree that a podling should be graduated. Geir asked for a
On 10/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Note that the best practice of LICENSE
and NOTICE in META-INF has been noted and addressed.
in theory, this is a best practice but in practice, this is almost
always a requirement :-)
every artifact distributed must have a LICENSE
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Don Brown wrote:
Agreed. I don't think it is fair to be making up graduation
requirements right when a project is about to graduate.
The graduation requirement is that a majority of the PMC members
agree that a podling should be
He just never seems to give up--like a small child not knowing when to
stop.
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 1:24 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [discussion] Harmony podling to ask for vote for
On 10/18/06, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
produce a release such that I can throw the Tomcat jar at it, too?
Sure, it is a developer release, but it let's non-Harmony folks play
with your project.
i'd like to give
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
produce a release such that I can throw the Tomcat jar at it, too?
Sure, it is a developer release, but it let's non-Harmony folks play
with your
On 10/17/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Yoko community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Yoko
Milestone 1.
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now
like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
milestone on
Hi all,
I've just committed the clearance form for Triplesec here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/directory-triplesec.xml
The tar ball of the contribution which has a SHA1 checksum in the
document above has been made available here:
On 10/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
produce a release such that I can throw the Tomcat jar at it, too?
Sure, it is a
On Oct 18, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Grote, Judy wrote:
He just never seems to give up--like a small child not knowing when to
stop.
No, more like an old grandpa who sees his grandkids grab a pair of
scissors and then asks the parents whether they've taught them
not to start running around the room
nice thanks!
On 10/18/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Plus there are some that I'm not sure if there is a syntax for comments.
Anybody know if you can add comments to a JAAS config file?
See
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
produce a release such that I can throw the Tomcat jar at
Folks,
I completely agree with Geir on that the community is healthy and
very active.. All the new folks on the ppmc have demonstrated to my
satisfaction that they will do well as the pmc of a TLP. I definitely
don't think we need a release out to gauge it.
thanks,
dims
On 10/18/06, Geir
Please note. Today is October 1. Time to start getting the Board reports
posted. We will no longer hold the report pending late arrivals, at the
Board's insistence.
TODAY IS OCTOBER 18. If it were not for ApacheCon, Agila, AltRMI,
CeltiXfire, JuICE, Harmony, and Roller would ALL BE MISSING
In case this was buried, it's important for -all- projects to pay attention
to Noel's comment below, going forwards...
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Finally, would all projects please make sure to add:
* Project name and one-line summary
* Date of entry to the Incubator
* Top three items to
31 matches
Mail list logo
