On 11/11/06, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CXF and Tuscany are currently using incubator. Yoko is using incubating.
Does it matter?
Nah. -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Abdera uses incubating.
-Stephen
On 11/11/06, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday November 11 2006 3:51 pm, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 11/11/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or is it ok to do:
groupIdorg.apache.wicket/groupid
artifactIdwicket-parent/artifactId
The Jakarta Commons community has voted to accept a donation from Luc
Maisonoble of the Mantissa math library, for inclusion in Jakarta
Commons Math.
The IP clearance form is checked into /ip-clearance as
jakarta-commons-mantissa.xml.
The source is here:
sounds good!
On 11/12/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Jakarta Commons community has voted to accept a donation from Luc
Maisonoble of the Mantissa math library, for inclusion in Jakarta
Commons Math.
The IP clearance form is checked into /ip-clearance as
On 11/12/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Jakarta Commons community has voted to accept a donation from Luc
Maisonoble of the Mantissa math library, for inclusion in Jakarta
Commons Math.
The IP clearance form is checked into /ip-clearance as
jakarta-commons-mantissa.xml.
The
incubating appears to be the more common - let's make incubating our standard.
Hen
On 11/12/06, Stephen Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Abdera uses incubating.
-Stephen
On 11/11/06, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday November 11 2006 3:51 pm, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 11/11/06,
Garrett Rooney wrote:
I think it's unrealistic to expect that the majority of the members of
the incubator PMC will be involved in most votes.
The Incubator PMC is the second largest in the ASF, and likely to become the
largest in short order. As long as we have sufficient oversight, I agree
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
People like Robert have been complete stud muffins in this regards.
Big kudos to him and RAT. It's been a major step forward and I'm very
thankful for his recent efforts.
Robert has been a huge help, and I'd like to encourage the use of RAT
ASF-wide, and at least as
Sam Ruby wrote:
I call on those who wish to set the expectation that certain votes are
to occur on this list to actively foster the notion that people who are
members of this PMC are expected to actively participate.
Better?
Yes. :-)
--- Noel
Ken asked:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is where incubation happens.
That is perjorative. Want to start again?
What the flying moose ears is wrong with people today?
Everyone seems to be hyper-sensitive and twitchy.
Ken wrote:
Garrett raises a point about which I want to ask.
What criteria should a mentor use when it comes to
voting on a release? I for one can't make any
judgement of its technical worth.
IMO: IP issues and decision making process. And RAT. And, of course, the
Mentor is able to also
Daniel Kulp wrote:
In the last couple months, I've seen MULTIPLE instances where the mentors
for various projects (according to their proposal and STATUS pages)
didn't even know they were mentors for the project. I've seen responses
like I didn't look at it or vote because I didn't know I
On 11/12/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That may be true, but as ASF Members (which most are), I would expect (and
have observed) that they have an overall concern regarding events that
effect the ASF.
Sure, but having an overall concern about events that effect the ASF
is
Ken wrot:
I just spent a considerable amount of time going through
all the podling status pages, and there's a certain..
lack of uniformity about them. I've attached the results.
Thank you for doing that, Ken. :-)
I've noted the same when doing spot checks in the past, as have (for
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
That may be true, but as ASF Members (which most are), I would expect
(and
have observed) that they have an overall concern regarding events that
effect the ASF.
Sure, but having an overall concern about events that effect the ASF
is
I did notice that other pages had changed, but I figured that it had
happened as part of the site generation process.
When that many pages change, it is usually due to EOL issues.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I challenge all the other Incubator PMC members who have yet
to vote to follow through on their responsibilities as a
member of this PMC.
It seems to me that anyone paying attention would have seen that there were
issues with the proposed release, and they were being addressed. Therefore,
I
The Incubator continues to be very active.
The recent graduation of Harmony has led to a healthy discussion of what
types of votes should be held on which mailing lists. Ken Coar also
conducted a general review of the STATUS files for current Incubator
projects, which has led to a number of
Reminder: Please take a look at the proposed release and vote on it.
So far, we have a +1 from Robert.
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany
On 11/7/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
key ID 96324791 used to sign releases is
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
It seems to me that anyone paying attention would have seen that there
were
issues with the proposed release, and they were being addressed.
And some people may also have missed, or been confused by, the fact that
Tuscany has several votes running concurrently.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I did notice that other pages had changed, but I figured that it had
happened as part of the site generation process.
When that many pages change, it is usually due to EOL issues.
...or due to one of the anchor sources changing which are reflected on
many pages. In
On Nov 10, 2006, at 12:04 PM, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Top three reasons why a project should join the ASF
2. A development communtity wants to help manage and oversee the
Foundation.
As in: a career move or plain idealism? ;) I mean, caring about ASF
(and having been using it's projects
22 matches
Mail list logo
