Re: [Fwd: [VOTE] Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release DAS for Java M2 artifacts]

On 11/14/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks, I withdraw my -1. Ditto. -- justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Graduate OFBiz Podling

On Nov 14, 2006, at 5:12 AM, David E Jones wrote: Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 Graduate OFBiz Podling [ ] +0 Abstain [ ] -1 Do not Graduate OFBiz Podling I think this time I'll ignore all procedural thingies and just enthousiastically vote +1 great work, peeps! Do let me know if I sho

[ANNOUNCE] Tuscany SDO Java Milestone 2 Release

The Apache Tuscany community is pleased to announce its Milestone 2 release of SDO (Service Data Objects). You can download binary and source distributions from: http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/downloads.html For further information, visit our web site at: http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany

"Collaborative Development" items on Incubator status pages (was Re: [DISCUSS] incubator voting process)

Craig L Russell wrote: > On Nov 10, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > >> On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> 6. Cayenne: >>> Mentors:Jean Anderson, Brian McAllister, Bill Dudney >>> Started:March 2006 >>> Incomplete: Nothing >>>

[RESULT] Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release DAS for Java M2 artifacts

This vote has passed with +1s from : Robert Burrell Donkin, Davanum Srinivas, Noel J. Bergman. There were no -1s. Thank you all that took the time to help getting the DAS release done. - Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany On 11/15/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/14/06, Henr

Account request - new Tuscany committer - Geoffrey Winn

Preferred userid: gwinn Full name: Geoffrey Martin Winn Forwarding email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Requested Karma for: ws ws-tuscany ICLA has been submitted and appears on http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html Vote result 8+1 votes and no -1s: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mb

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ CPP 1.0

On 11/15/06, Nathan Mittler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The ActiveMQ community has voted on the release of ActiveMQ CPP 1.0 with a total of 6 +1's. The source bundle for the release candidate can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~tabish/activemq-cpp-1.0.zip And here's the wiki page for th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.1.0 (RC 2)

On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey folks, I was able to finally get around to doing a binary release candidate from the 4.1 branch. it's available here: http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.1.0-RC2/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-act

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ CPP 1.0

On 11/15/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i'm guessing that *.vcproj are visual C++ project files (right?). they lack license headers. does the format support comments? The files are "`XML", but Visual Studio is notoriously picky about what's in them. I've never tried to s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.1.0 (RC 2)

On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey folks, I was able to finally get around to doing a binary release candidate from the 4.1 branch. it's available here: http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.1.0-RC2/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-act

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ CPP 1.0

On 11/15/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/15/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm guessing that *.vcproj are visual C++ project files (right?). they > lack license headers. does the format support comments? The files are "`XML", but Visual Studio is noto

Re: [VOTE] Graduate OFBiz Podling

On 11/15/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David E Jones wrote: > If I understand correctly what you are saying there is one more step > to take before we seek an approval vote from the Incubator PMC, > namely creating and submitting a proposal to the Incubator PMC that > they will

Re: wikis

David Crossley wrote: Gwyn Evans wrote: Davanum Srinivas wrote: Eelco, Here's the background: The current set of volunteers dealing with infra always pushed back on a confluence install. *But* a very vocal group demanded that it be installed and promised to maintain it. But when the time comes

[VOTE] publish openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release

The OpenJPA incubator community voted on and has approved a proposal to release OpenJPA 0.9.6-incubating. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy (http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/ Incubation_Policy.html#Releases ) we would now like to request the permission of the

Re: Maven pom, groupId and version for incubating projects

On 12 Nov 06, at 6:17 PM 12 Nov 06, Henri Yandell wrote: incubating appears to be the more common - let's make incubating our standard. As a qualifier a noun should be used like alpha, beta, milestone. No one generally uses verbs in a version like incubating. Also because it's just the

Re: Maven pom, groupId and version for incubating projects

I think incubating here is being used in noun form as a gerund... ;) -Stephen On 11/15/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12 Nov 06, at 6:17 PM 12 Nov 06, Henri Yandell wrote: > incubating appears to be the more common - let's make incubating > our standard. > As a qualifier a no

Re: Maven pom, groupId and version for incubating projects

Hate to quibble, but incubating is a gerund used as an adjective. ;-) I also think of alpha and beta as adjectives also, as in "the alpha version", alpha being an adjective modifying version. Bottom line, I like incubating, as it describes the release, as opposed to incubator which isn't ve

Re: Maven pom, groupId and version for incubating projects

Good point! :) -Stephen On 11/15/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hate to quibble, but incubating is a gerund used as an adjective. ;-) I also think of alpha and beta as adjectives also, as in "the alpha version", alpha being an adjective modifying version. Bottom line, I like i

Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ CPP 1.0

I believe the doxygen file was autogenerated - not sure how doxygen likes comments :) I've submitted a KEYS file to svn and have created the sig http://people.apache.org/~tabish/activemq-cpp-1.0.zip.asc Also, when we go to cut the rele

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.1.0 (RC 2)

On 11/15/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey folks, > > I was able to finally get around to doing a binary release candidate > from the 4.1 branch. > > it's available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubato

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.1.0 (RC 2)

On 11/15/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey folks, > > I was able to finally get around to doing a binary release candidate > from the 4.1 branch. > > it's available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubato

[STATUS] (incubator) Wed Nov 15 23:55:14 2006

APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $] Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/ Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ [note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki

Re: Maven pom, groupId and version for incubating projects

On 15 Nov 06, at 8:34 PM 15 Nov 06, Craig L Russell wrote: Hate to quibble, but incubating is a gerund used as an adjective. ;-) I also think of alpha and beta as adjectives also, as in "the alpha version", alpha being an adjective modifying version. Bottom line, I like incubating, as it d

[jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-50) adffaces/trinidad page update

adffaces/trinidad page update - Key: INCUBATOR-50 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-50 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Improvement Components: site Reporter: Matthias Weßendo

[jira] Updated: (INCUBATOR-50) adffaces/trinidad page update

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-50?page=all ] Matthias Weßendorf updated INCUBATOR-50: Attachment: incubator_adffaces_page.patch the updated page (the patch for it) > adffaces/trinidad page update > -

[Podlings] mailing list

Hi, since all committers at Apache are on the committers email list, all pmcs on pmc list,... , why not adding all committers on an incubation project to the general @ incubator list ? Would make sense to me, since most of those committers are completely new to the ASF, and time by time here are