On 12/20/06, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...The Solr community has voted to release apache-solr-1.1.0-incubating
We now ask the Incubator PMC to approve this release
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Dec 19, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On 12/11/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Can a PMC chair veto a release?
No. A chair only counts as one vote. A chair's only special powers
are to receive things officially and ensure that the PMC does vote.
Euh... no.
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 18:04, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
That's how it works.
No, that's not how it works.
Isn't it a bit scary that two of the most respected members of ASF don't agree
on how ASF operates when push come to shove ?
Cheers
Hi,
On 12/20/06, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 18:04, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
That's how it works.
No, that's not how it works.
Isn't it a bit scary that two of the most respected members of ASF don't
The chair is not delegated authority over the projects -- only
responsibility to manage the committee, and thus the only decisions
that a chair can go hog-wild on are the establishment of unusual
project bylaws or appointment and removal of committee members
(which requires an ACK by a board
On Dec 20, 2006, at 3:20 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 18:04, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
That's how it works.
No, that's not how it works.
Isn't it a bit scary that two of the most respected members of ASF
don't agree
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
If an officer believes that a release package should be vetoed
for legal reasons, then they should inform infrastructure to remove
the release from distribution.
Take that one step further...
s/officer/officer or member/
Any PMC member who discovers a legal violation
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as River.
You may be familiar with this project as it has been discussed under
other names, including Braintree and Jini. I've actually lost track of
the Quest for a Name,
+1 from me
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as River.
You may be familiar with this project as it has been discussed under
other names, including Braintree and Jini. I've
Note - this vote will be for 3 days, ending midnight, saturday december
23rd, 2006.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
It is with great relief and hope that I propose that the Apache
Incubator PMC vote to incubate a new podling, to be known as River.
You may be familiar with this project as it has
On Thursday 21 December 2006 11:46, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
[x] +1 Accept River as a new podling as described below
[ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please)
non-binding.
Cheers
Niclas
-
To unsubscribe,
+1
Phil
On 12/20/06, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 21 December 2006 11:46, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
[x] +1 Accept River as a new podling as described below
[ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please)
non-binding.
Cheers
Niclas
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the
On Thursday 21 December 2006 11:46, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
[x] +1 Accept River as a new podling as described below
[ ] -1 Do not accept the new podling (provide reason, please)
Good name too.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe,
14 matches
Mail list logo
