Hi all,
This is a vote on a previously posted proposal to start a rdf
database server project at apache. The entire proposal text is
included below. There is only one change from the one posted to the
[proposal] thread -- we will start without a triplesoup-users@
mailing list.
Please pl
On 2/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I'm proposing the following policy become explicit across the incubator;..
I'm +1 on the idea, with a suggestion below.
...committers may commit code they personally authored,
or with proper attribution, commit patches posted
I am +1 on this and the main reason for this is that people that become
committers through the
incubator don't necessarily have any experience with apache projects and how
issues like this are
normally handled. As a side effect it gives us the option to link to this
policy in case something
like
+1
Paul
On 2/2/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
This is a vote on a previously posted proposal to start a rdf
database server project at apache. The entire proposal text is
included below. There is only one change from the one posted to the
[proposal] thread -- we will start w
On 2/2/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...This is a vote on a previously posted proposal to start a rdf
database server project at apache. The entire proposal text is
included below. There is only one change from the one posted to the
[proposal] thread -- we will start without a triple
Hi,
On 2/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm proposing the following policy become explicit across the incubator;
-0
The policy itself seems good, but I'd rather see it as an ASF-wide
policy than something restricted to the Incubator. Why should an
incubating project ope
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 2/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I'm proposing the following policy become explicit across the
incubator;..
I'm +1 on the idea, with a suggestion below.
...committers may commit code they personally authored,
or with proper attribu
+1 (non-binding)
Sounds like a very useful (and fun) effort to me.
--Thilo
Leo Simons wrote:
Hi all,
This is a vote on a previously posted proposal to start a rdf database
server project at apache. The entire proposal text is included below.
There is only one change from the one posted to t
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:32 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I wonder if anyone other than me is reading everything before or
even after
it is submitted.
I tend to read all board reports, and read the ones for which I'm on
a PMC, or previously was a (formal or not) mentor for, completely. I
usuall
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 2/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...I'm proposing the following policy become explicit across the
incubator;..
I'm +1 on the idea, with a suggestion below.
...committers may commit code they personally authored,
or with proper attribu
Hola,
On 1/31/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > rather than close the cat-herding the weekend before the report
> > is [due], we could set a cut-off of the second Monday of each
> > month, or similarly appropriate date, and give the
+1, sounds very interesting.
Yoav
On 2/2/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
This is a vote on a previously posted proposal to start a rdf
database server project at apache. The entire proposal text is
included below. There is only one change from the one posted to the
[proposal]
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> For example, rather than close the cat-herding the weekend before the report
> is due (and, factually, finishing herding tardy projects the day that the
> report is filed), we could set a cut-off of the second Monday of each month,
> or simil
Roller has been in incubation since June 2005.
Since then,we've worked through all of the items on incubation
check-list, grown our community, demonstrated that we understand the
Apache way and dealt with our LGPL problem (we no longer include
Hibernate and we're planning to replace it in our nex
Hi,
On 2/2/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I assume that vote would just be about the reports submitted by podlings, not your
personal > notes add to the report ? The latter shouldn't be subject to votes
in my opinion..
I see it as more of a chance for the Incubator PMC to
Hola,
Cool beans ;) As someone who's only familiar with Roller as a user, I
have a couple of questions (mostly just out of curiosity):
- Has the roller podling PMC (PPMC) formally voted for graduation? I
couldn't quite find a [VOTE] thread on roller-dev for this.
- The original proposal
(http:
On 2/2/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cool beans ;) As someone who's only familiar with Roller as a user, I
have a couple of questions (mostly just out of curiosity):
- Has the roller podling PMC (PPMC) formally voted for graduation? I
couldn't quite find a [VOTE] thread on roller
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 2/2/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1, sounds very interesting.
Yoav
On 2/2/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote on a previously posted proposal to start a rdf
> database server project at apache. The entire proposal text i
On 2/2/07, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/2/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool beans ;) As someone who's only familiar with Roller as a user, I
> have a couple of questions (mostly just out of curiosity):
>
> - Has the roller podling PMC (PPMC) formally voted for graduation
Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote on a previously posted proposal to start a rdf
> database server project at apache. The entire proposal text is
> included below. There is only one change from the one posted to the
> [proposal] thread -- we will start without a t
Upayavira wrote:
>
> I'd add clarification about 'committing third party code' with reference
> to libraries. I should be able to commit the latest log4j jar without
> having to do any jira nuisance. This is about committing the code itself
> as a contribution, not as a dependency.
I deliberately
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
I'd add clarification about 'committing third party code' with reference
to libraries. I should be able to commit the latest log4j jar without
having to do any jira nuisance. This is about committing the code itself
as a contribution, not as a depende
Doesn't this fall under the general "develop on the list" practice? I
would assume that developing on the list includes mentioning when you
are going to do something like swap out a library for a newer version.
Can someone articulate what problem this new policy proposal is
addressing and how it
On 2/1/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No third-party code (beyond bugzilla and mailing list submissions) may be
directly committed without first posing the submission to the mailing list.
This goes for submissions by associates who are unaffiliated with the
project, p
James Margaris wrote:
>
> Doesn't this fall under the general "develop on the list" practice? I
> would assume that developing on the list includes mentioning when you
> are going to do something like swap out a library for a newer version.
>
> Can someone articulate what problem this new poli
+1
-Brian
On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:17 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Hi all,
This is a vote on a previously posted proposal to start a rdf
database server project at apache. The entire proposal text is
included below. There is only one change from the one posted to the
[proposal] thread -- we will
Ted Husted wrote:
>
> I think the real issue here is off-list discussions.
Third is, yes. The other two thirds...
> So long as the commit is above-board, properly documentation in the
> Subversion log, and backed by a ICLA when applicable, I don't see what
> difference posting it to JIRA first
+1
On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:17 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Hi all,
This is a vote on a previously posted proposal to start a rdf
database server project at apache. The entire proposal text is
included below. There is only one change from the one posted to the
[proposal] thread -- we will start wi
Leo Simons wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote on a previously posted proposal to start a rdf database
> server project at apache. The entire proposal text is included below.
> There is only one change from the one posted to the [proposal] thread --
> we will start without a triplesoup-users@ mail
29 matches
Mail list logo
