[VOTE] approve the release of Trinidad's Maven plugins (1.0.0-incubating)

2007-02-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
The Trinidad community voted to release the the maven plugins as a 1.0.0-incubating release. These plugins are required for the maven build of the "core" code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator guides, we like to ask you guys, the Incubator PMC, for a permission to release those mav

[STATUS] (incubator) Wed Feb 21 23:56:26 2007

2007-02-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $] Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/ Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ [note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki

Re: podling BIS notifications

2007-02-21 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Feb 20, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote: +1 to everything above -- although, rather than saying a later notice needs to be sent out when the encryption functionality changes, I'd put it as, "a later notice needs to be sent when any information on the prior notice has changed"...but this

Re: incubator releases need to be under www.a.o/dist/incubator

2007-02-21 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Leo Simons wrote: On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:08 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: One thing that seems to have been forgotten is that an approved release must be in the form of SOURCE CODE and must be placed in the associated PMC's public distribution area under http://www.a

Re: incubator releases need to be under www.a.o/dist/incubator

2007-02-21 Thread Leo Simons
On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:08 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: One thing that seems to have been forgotten is that an approved release must be in the form of SOURCE CODE and must be placed in the associated PMC's public distribution area under http://www.apache.org/dist/ The second "must" there in tha

Re: BouncyCastle IDEA patent

2007-02-21 Thread David Jencks
On Feb 21, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: On Feb 21, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Regarding Bouncy Castle, IIRC they used to include the IDEA algorithm in their distribution and provided a one-off for Geronimo to use to bypass the patent issue. Not sure if that is an

Re: BouncyCastle IDEA patent

2007-02-21 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Feb 21, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Regarding Bouncy Castle, IIRC they used to include the IDEA algorithm in their distribution and provided a one-off for Geronimo to use to bypass the patent issue. Not sure if that is an issue or not for Tuscany but just a heads up. Thank

Re: BouncyCastle export for Tuscany, was: [Vote] Abdera v0.2.2

2007-02-21 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Regarding Bouncy Castle, IIRC they used to include the IDEA algorithm in their distribution and provided a one-off for Geronimo to use to bypass the patent issue. Not sure if that is an issue or not for Tuscany but just a heads up. On Feb 20, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: On Fe

Re: incubator releases need to be under www.a.o/dist/incubator

2007-02-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The question is whether or not an entity which is not an > official ASF "project" (a podling) can release code that is > an official release. IMO, the answer is NO SO ... anything the podling wants to consider for release belongs in incubator.a.o/dev/dist/podling/ (or a

Re: incubator releases need to be under www.a.o/dist/incubator

2007-02-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jim Jagielski wrote: > > The question is whether or not an entity which is not an > official ASF "project" (a podling) can release code that is > an official release. IMO, the answer is NO and that is > why the Incubator is, in fact, the "releasing" entity. So > YES, it is "official" since the Inc

Tuscany diversity, was: Incubator Board Report, February 2007

2007-02-21 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Feb 19, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: == Tuscany == iPMC Reviewers: dims, jerenkrantz, yoavs, jukka, twl, noel Tuscany provides infrastructure for developing service-oriented applications based on the OSOA specifications for Service Component Architecture (SCA) and Service Data

Re: incubator releases need to be under www.a.o/dist/incubator

2007-02-21 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 20, 2007, at 8:56 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On 2/20/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The "associated PMC" would be the Incubator, and you might notice that there is not an incubator/ directory under those locations. As I understand it, the primary issue is that there

Re: incubator releases need to be under www.a.o/dist/incubator

2007-02-21 Thread Davanum Srinivas
I guess, i am not in favor of blurring the lines. Is this a vote? thanks, -- dims On 2/21/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ignoring other parts of the thread, I'm strongly +1 to Incubator releases being treated as normal ASF releases at an infrastructure level. Both in terms of th

Re: incubator releases need to be under www.a.o/dist/incubator

2007-02-21 Thread Henri Yandell
Ignoring other parts of the thread, I'm strongly +1 to Incubator releases being treated as normal ASF releases at an infrastructure level. Both in terms of the distributions going into /www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ and the maven2 incubator repository being closed down and merged into the o