Ignoring other parts of the thread,
I'm strongly +1 to Incubator releases being treated as normal ASF
releases at an infrastructure level.
Both in terms of the distributions going into
/www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/ and the maven2 incubator
repository being closed down and merged into the
I guess, i am not in favor of blurring the lines. Is this a vote?
thanks,
-- dims
On 2/21/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignoring other parts of the thread,
I'm strongly +1 to Incubator releases being treated as normal ASF
releases at an infrastructure level.
Both in terms of the
On Feb 20, 2007, at 8:56 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/20/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The associated PMC would be the Incubator, and you might notice
that there
is not an incubator/ directory under those locations.
As I understand it, the primary issue is that there
On Feb 19, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
== Tuscany ==
iPMC Reviewers: dims, jerenkrantz, yoavs, jukka, twl, noel
Tuscany provides infrastructure for developing service-oriented
applications
based on the OSOA specifications for Service Component Architecture
(SCA)
and Service Data
Jim Jagielski wrote:
The question is whether or not an entity which is not an
official ASF project (a podling) can release code that is
an official release. IMO, the answer is NO and that is
why the Incubator is, in fact, the releasing entity. So
YES, it is official since the Incubator said
Jim Jagielski wrote:
The question is whether or not an entity which is not an
official ASF project (a podling) can release code that is
an official release. IMO, the answer is NO
SO ... anything the podling wants to consider for release belongs in
incubator.a.o/dev/dist/podling/ (or
Regarding Bouncy Castle, IIRC they used to include the IDEA algorithm
in their distribution and provided a one-off for Geronimo to use to
bypass the patent issue. Not sure if that is an issue or not for
Tuscany but just a heads up.
On Feb 20, 2007, at 12:52 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On
On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:08 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
One thing that seems to have been forgotten is that an approved
release must be in the form of SOURCE CODE and must be placed
in the associated PMC's public distribution area under
http://www.apache.org/dist/
The second must there in that
On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:08 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
One thing that seems to have been forgotten is that an approved
release must be in the form of SOURCE CODE and must be placed
in the associated PMC's public distribution area under
On Feb 20, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
+1 to everything above -- although, rather than saying a later notice
needs to be sent out when the encryption functionality changes, I'd
put it as, a later notice needs to be sent when any information on
the prior notice has changed...but this
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the
The Trinidad community voted to release the the maven
plugins as a 1.0.0-incubating release. These plugins are required for the maven
build of the core code of the Trinidad Podling. To fulfill the incubator
guides, we like to ask you guys, the Incubator PMC, for a permission to release
those
12 matches
Mail list logo
