Re: [VOTE][Retry] Approve the release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-12 Thread Marshall Schor
Jean T. Anderson wrote: Overall the release looks good to me. I verified the *.asc signatures and looked more closely at uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.tar.gz . I noticed just one thing that struck me as odd in the user documentation. The UIMA Documentation Overview in uima-docbooks/src/index.html

Re: [VOTE][Retry] Approve the release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-12 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
+1 The copyright statement is true, AFAIK. Portions are still under IBM's copyright, and acknowledging that in this way seems good to me for the reasons Marshall named. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist

Re: [VOTE][Retry] Approve the release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Daniel John Debrunner wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: Jean T. Anderson wrote: Overall the release looks good to me. I verified the *.asc signatures and looked more closely at uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.tar.gz . I noticed just one thing that struck me as odd in the user documentation. The UIMA

Re: [VOTE][Retry] Approve the release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating

2007-03-12 Thread Sam Ruby
+1 On 3/8/07, Adam Lally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After correcting some issues in our last release candidate (thanks to Jean Anderson for finding these), the Apache UIMA community has again voted to release version 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to approve this