On Tuesday 03 April 2007 23:45, Marshall Schor wrote:
> The Apache UIMA community has voted to release
> org.apache.uima.desceditor.2.1.0.incubating-hotfix-1.zip .
> We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
> approve this "hotfix" release.
[x] +1 Approve the release of the "hotfix" artifact:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 11:10, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Is it standard practice to take the existing PPMC forward to the
> board or can the project, in its discretion, suggest a PMC made
> up of a different group of members?
The 'standard' practice is that the PPMC is moved forward to the new
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 12:19, Brett Porter wrote:
> The OpenEJB PPMC would like to take feedback on the following
> graduation proposal before putting it to a vote by the incubator PMC.
+1. (after very positive signs from related communities. Thanks.)
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Develo
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 02:01, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process.
>
> +1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I understand,
> if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don't I?)
AFAIK, you *must* be on the IPMC to be a mentor
On 04/04/07, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it appropriate to include those members
in the proposal or simply stay with the PPMC and build the new PMC
after graduation?
Its very easy to do either - the PPMC can vote to add those people to
the current PPMC before taking the vote to
OpenEJB is in the process of graduating from incubation. A question
has come up about the composition of the PMC for a resolution that is
brought the board as a request to be a TLP. Is it standard practice
to take the existing PPMC forward to the board or can the project, in
its discretio
Hi Niclas,
On Apr 3, 2007, at 1:27 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 12:19, Brett Porter wrote:
The OpenEJB PPMC would like to take feedback on the following
graduation proposal before putting it to a vote by the incubator PMC.
Before voting officially on this, I would like
Hello Matthias, thanks for the reply.
>
> I am not really familiar w/ XAP. XAP can be used to enable
> JSP/Servlet/Struts/Shale/JSF pages by putting some ajax stuff and a
> "binding" for the components/tags?
> One idea that the community could work on is to add
XAP-Bridge/Support.
>
XAP does A
+1 (binding)
Mvgr,
Martin
Omar Tazi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on a positive initial feedback we are calling a vote on the RCF
> contribution (see proposal below).
>
> This proposal is for the donation of a rich component library for the
> JavaServer Faces technology to the Apache Software Foundati
Hello Coach Wei,
On 4/3/07, Coach Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hope these questions are not too late with regard to this proposal.
not to late :)
1. The RCF components are fairly well developed and documented already,
which is great, but it also means that there is very limited capacity
f
I have updated the Apache Tuscany status file [1] and status page [2] with
the list of mentors and small other updates to sync up the two pages. This
should avoid confusion in the future.
[1] - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/STATUS
[2] - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 30, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
We've had plenty of time for discussion on this, so I'd like to
have a vote on accepting a new committers ACL for the Heraldry
podling. This set of committers, along with the mentors will be
the
It's a problem though, when there is only one committer on the code.
I encourage you to approach both the Tomcat and Jakarta communities to
attract some additional hackers!
We (Incubator PMC) won't permit a release when there are fewer than three
sets of eyeballs on the -code-, because by definiti
Hey,
over at FtpServer we have a issue with the lack of mentors/commiters.
Currently, there is only one active commiter (me) and no active mentors.
This causes some issues with the project. As a way of promoting the
project and possibly get more people interested in contributing, it's my
beli
Instead of reinventing the wheel of
building yet another set of Ajax components, it uses existing Ajax
toolkits such as Dojo, etc. Does RCF use its own Ajax toolkit or uses
some third party Ajax toolkit?
Even though toolkits such as Dojo are high quality and have a broad
feature set, it is not a
On 4/3/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process.
+1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I understand,
if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don't I?)
As an ASF Member, you can ping [EMAIL PROTECTED] dir
Hope these questions are not too late with regard to this proposal.
1. The RCF components are fairly well developed and documented already,
which is great, but it also means that there is very limited capacity
for the Apache community to influence and innovate from here. Obviously,
we don't want
typo
On 4/3/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think a member has a binding vote here, not sure.
has => hasn't
A member can be (will be) added to inc pmc
(at least when a member is a mentor, like you)
.M
On 4/3/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a
I think a member has a binding vote here, not sure.
A member can be (will be) added to inc pmc
(at least when a member is a mentor, like you)
.M
On 4/3/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process.
+1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incuba
As a mentor, I do obviously approve this process.
+1 (non-binding, as I am not an Incubator PMC member. As I understand,
if this proposal goes through, I do become one, don't I?)
Best regards
Henning
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 16:15 -0700, Omar Tazi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based o
+1
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
On 4/2/07, Omar Tazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Based on a positive initial feedback we are calling a vote on the RCF
contribution (see proposal below).
This proposal is for the donation of a rich component library for the
JavaServer Faces technology to the Apache Software Foundation. The live
v
+1
On 4/3/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxyge
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 04/04/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So it was just a coincidence that you happened to look at the file and
remove yourself a few hours before a roll call was posted to the PPMC list?
Yep - actually, I was looking in incubator-info.txt because of OpenEJB.
Thanks,
Brett
The Apache UIMA community has voted to release
org.apache.uima.desceditor.2.1.0.incubating-hotfix-1.zip .
We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to
approve this "hotfix" release.
This release consists of 1 zip file containing a replacement for one of the
Eclipse plugins included in the curren
Brett Porter wrote:
> I think I was listed in these two files because I was a champion of
> the original proposal. However, as they came to incubate, I never
> became a mentor (I've never been on the PPMC list)
Fair enough, thanks for clarifying.
> I hadn't even noticed I was listed until I look
Sounds great! thanks.
-- dims
On 4/3/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 03/04/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett,
>
> Was there a process by which this list of pmc members
> was arrived at?
The group decided, at the start of incubation, to bootstrap the PPMC
wi
On 03/04/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brett,
Was there a process by which this list of pmc members
was arrived at?
The group decided, at the start of incubation, to bootstrap the PPMC
with just the mentors and have them add PPMC members as a normal PMC
would. So those names
Apologies Noel, I meant to send an explanation and hadn't come back to it yet.
I think I was listed in these two files because I was a champion of
the original proposal. However, as they came to incubate, I never
became a mentor (I've never been on the PPMC list) - and at least at
the time there
Nate Grandner wrote:
hi,
I'm not sure where to ask this (since it is a usage question, not a
project or dev one), but I have a quick question dealing with the
address sent as a response to the PASV command. My FTP Server is behind
a router, so the passive IP is set to the local address of the
Author: brett
> I haven't been a mentor of [ServiceMix]
Brett, is this your choice to leave, or something that ServiceMix is doing? I
checked the ServiceMix mailing lists, and don't see anything there. Elsewhere,
you noted "listed due to a mixup, was never a mentor" -- what was the mixup?
Act
Brett,
+1 in general. One question though, i see a few more names on the
committer list (http://incubator.apache.org/openejb/team.html) that i
don't see here. Was there a process by which this list of pmc members
was arrived at?
thanks,
dims
On 4/3/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
T
Niclas,
It's Sam, Geir and myself.
-- dims
On 4/3/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 16:04, Luciano Resende wrote:
> Passed with PPMC +1 from lresende, ajborley, antelder, robbinspg,
> jsdelfino, kelvingoodson, svkrish, rfeng, slaws
> and no -1s
Who are the
On 4/3/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IIUIC, both Hibernate and Kodo builds EJB3 & (Hibernate|JDO) on top of the JPA
layers in the same product.
Hibernate != EJB 3.0 whereas JBoss AS 4/5 + EJB 3.0 profile == EJB 3.0.
Hibernate EntityManager is a JPA provider as Apache OpenJPA a
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 17:23, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> I wonder what you meant by 'apparent overlap'.
IIUIC, both Hibernate and Kodo builds EJB3 & (Hibernate|JDO) on top of the JPA
layers in the same product.
> EJB 3.0 spec is made of two parts - EJB 3.0 Core and JPA. The former is
> what O
On 4/3/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before voting officially on this, I would like to hear from the OpenEJB and
OpenJPA communities, of the apparent overlap in scope and whether we will see
some form of convergence between the projects has been discussed, and if so
what the conc
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 10:44, Nate Grandner wrote:
> I'm not sure where to ask this (since it is a usage question, not a
> project or dev one), but I have a quick question dealing with the
> address sent as a response to the PASV command.
Since the FtpServer project has decided not to open a u
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 16:04, Luciano Resende wrote:
> Passed with PPMC +1 from lresende, ajborley, antelder, robbinspg,
> jsdelfino, kelvingoodson, svkrish, rfeng, slaws
> and no -1s
Who are the mentors on Tuscany now?? Is it Dims?
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tuscany doesn't list any.
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 12:19, Brett Porter wrote:
> The OpenEJB PPMC would like to take feedback on the following
> graduation proposal before putting it to a vote by the incubator PMC.
Before voting officially on this, I would like to hear from the OpenEJB and
OpenJPA communities, of the appa
On Tuesday 03 April 2007 07:15, Omar Tazi wrote:
> Please cast your votes.
+0, binding.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
---
Hey,
that's what I do in a similar fashion. Since it takes to long amout of
time, I "deploy" the stuff to a folder on my box, ZIP it and upload
it. on people.a.o I run unzip.
So, keeping the ZIP / tarball at the root of the stage repo, would be
a good work around.
But spider is cooler :-)
On
Passed with PPMC +1 from lresende, ajborley, antelder, robbinspg, jsdelfino,
kelvingoodson, svkrish, rfeng, slaws
and no -1s
Welcome to the project Adriano.
On 3/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/28/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymo
hi,
I'm not sure where to ask this (since it is a usage question, not a
project or dev one), but I have a quick question dealing with the
address sent as a response to the PASV command. My FTP Server is
behind a router, so the passive IP is set to the local address of the
server. Is it po
44 matches
Mail list logo
