+1
Many thanks to Bill, Aaron, Ted, and everyone else involved now and earlier
with the project.
> As with any retired or domant open source project here at Apache,
> should a future team of developers be interested in picking where
> others left off, they may do so by forming a proposal and emai
+1 on retirement.
J Aaron Farr wrote:
> This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to
> 'retired' status.
>
> Earlier this year the Heraldry project was reorganized in order to
> make another attempt at incubating an OpenID project. Unfortunately,
> the reconstituted podl
+1 to retire
On Jun 1, 2007, at 2:15 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to
'retired' status.
Earlier this year the Heraldry project was reorganized in order to
make another attempt at incubating an OpenID project. Unfortunately,
the rec
Coping incubator general and apache legal lists on this thread for
additional comments on this topic.
Carl.
John O'Hara wrote:
Yes, IBM are I fully paid up licensee of Java technology - and can do
whatever they like with it.
I asked permission of IBM if we could implement the XMS API some ti
In case you've not seen this, IBM have long since rendered the JMS API into
C++, C and C#
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0509_philli
ps/0509_phillips.html
Colin.
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnaud Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 June 2007 1
...Please vote for the Heraldry Podling Termination:
[X ] +1, terminate the Heraldry podling and move to 'retired'
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
On 6/1/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[x] +1, terminate the Heraldry podling and move to 'retired'
Cheers
Niclas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
[x] +1, terminate the Heraldry podling and move to 'retired'
Cheers
Niclas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
We have been thinking about implementing the NMS API as part of the
QPID .Net client. However we are concerned about potential legal issues.
It seems to me that the NMS API is very similar to the JMS one but the
JMS specification specifically licenses the technology "only for Java".
This i
On 6/1/07, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[X] +1, terminate the Heraldry podling and move to 'retired'
[ ] -1, do not terminate the podling at this time
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
On 5/30/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
> One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from
> different members of the Incubator PMC on: "Who can and who can not
> send the account setup mail to root?"
The view that counts is from
htt
On 6/1/07, Matt Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 to retire
+1
Thanks again to all for all the valuable time spent on the original
Heraldry project and the attempted reboot.
+1
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
+1 to retire
On 6/1/07, Matt Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 to retire
Thanks again to all for all the valuable time spent on the original
Heraldry project and the attempted reboot.
Matt
On Jun 1, 2007, at 5:15 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
>
> This is a vote to move the Heraldry project
Hi Bill,
Thanks for clarifying your position. This is a bit of a surprise,
since I thought I was just elaborating existing practice as
documented in the ppmc guide.
The section in question had been in the guides/ppmc for as long as
I've been at Apache, and I missed any dialog regarding th
Hi,
As mentioned in the last Graffito status report [1], the project is
now voting [2] to request termination due to lack of interest and
progress. If the Graffito vote is positive, I will ask the IPMC to
ratify the termination in a separate vote on this list. See the
Graffito status page [3] for
+1 to retire
Thanks again to all for all the valuable time spent on the original
Heraldry project and the attempted reboot.
Matt
On Jun 1, 2007, at 5:15 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to
'retired' status.
Earlier this year the H
J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to
> 'retired' status.
>
> Earlier this year the Heraldry project was reorganized in order to
> make another attempt at incubating an OpenID project. Unfortunately,
> the reconstituted po
This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to
'retired' status.
Earlier this year the Heraldry project was reorganized in order to
make another attempt at incubating an OpenID project. Unfortunately,
the reconstituted podling has been unable to reboot and the remaining
co
Martin Sebor wrote:
> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>>
>>> How could a PPMC participate in a vote on the Incubator PMC's private
>>> list?
>>
>> It cannot, and I don't believe I implied that this would be the case.
>> The idea is that the PPMC, with the help of the Mentors, conducts a
>> discussion and a
19 matches
Mail list logo
