On 7/31/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/31/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > Some of the same comments on the previous M7a release still apply, eg,
> its
> > preferred to have a separate DISCLAIMER file, having all licenses in a
> > single LI
Hi Matthieu,
On Jul 31, 2007, at 8:51 AM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
I'd rather have all the specific licenses each
in there file reproduced side by side with the library the license is
applied on (with similar namings, i.e. dom4j-1.3.LICENSE) and a simple
pointer in the main LICENSE file ("licenses
> "Following general@" isn't a great effort. The last 2 weeks we are looking at
> ~10-12 messages a day on average. And if one is really short on time, which
> happens to all of us, it is fairly easy to skip a couple of threads...
I found that subscribing to a digest instead of the list itself
m
On Wednesday 01 August 2007 00:26, Matthieu Riou wrote:
> I've seen the documentation as well but couldn't find the justification
> behind it.
I think it relates to Legal Folks like single files, which can be read as a
Word Document once(!) and then poked around inside. Only developers are fond
On 7/31/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/31/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/31/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 from me.
> > >
> > > Some of the same comments on the previous M7a release still apply, eg,
> > > its
> > > preferred
I like the idea of the license maven artifact. It takes quite some
effort in determining the actual license of any dependency (I've been
on a license hunt myself several times). Having the license published
in the repository next to the (jar) artifact (and included in the
artifacts META-INF folder)
On 7/31/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/31/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > Some of the same comments on the previous M7a release still apply, eg,
> > its
> > preferred to have a separate DISCLAIMER file, having all licenses in a
> > single
I must agree about the nightmare.
Including separate files is much easier and could be automated by
maven or any other build tool much more easily...
On 7/31/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/31/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > Some of the same
On 7/31/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Some of the same comments on the previous M7a release still apply, eg, its
> preferred to have a separate DISCLAIMER file, having all licenses in a
> single LICENSE file, and have src and binary distro's unpack into
> different
>
+1 from me.
Some of the same comments on the previous M7a release still apply, eg, its
preferred to have a separate DISCLAIMER file, having all licenses in a
single LICENSE file, and have src and binary distro's unpack into different
folders.
...ant
On 7/30/07, Graham Turrell (gmail) <[EMAIL
On Monday 30 July 2007 15:41, Gilles Scokart wrote:
> Did you like the idea? Are there people here wanting to collaborate
> on it? What does the mentors here advices for the next steps?
Not that *I* would spend my time on making this a reality, but I would enjoy
the end result...
I think this
Thanks Robert,
I finally managed to prod one of our mentors into getting the grant form
added to:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
We'll start the rest of the steps now that that has been done and we can
start filling in the check box dates and such.
Thanks!
Dan
On Wednesday 25 Jul
i count:
+1 robertburrelldonkin (*)
+1 Yoav Shapira (*)
+1 Guillaume Nodet
+1 Martijn Dashorst
+1 Matthieu Riou
+1 Craig L Russell (*)
+1 Niclas Hedhman(*)
unless someone jumps in with a correction, i will proceed
- robert
-
To
On 7/29/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the SDO
> Java 1.0-incubating release.
> The tuscany-dev list vote passed with 5+1s (2 IPMC binding), see ref [0] below
> The release candidate RC3 for Tuscany Java SDO archive dis
14 matches
Mail list logo