Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>> I would just add that JSR-311 might also be an option.
>> As an aside (and since you folks are on the Expert Group), do we
>> know if JAX-RS will be under a suitable specification license,
>> or has Sun encumbered it as they have other Sun-led specifications?
> We don't
This vote has lasted much longer than 72 hours. We have binding +1
votes from 3 IPMC people and no -1 or 0 votes. (in addition to the CXF
committer votes)
Binding +1: Jim Jagielski, Robert Donkin, James Strachan
This vote has passed. I'm proceeding with the release and moving the
artif
The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
DAS beta1 (1.0-incubating-beta1). The vote thread is here ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg21549.html
Since this is a very small delta on the RC3 (see the detailed
information below) I crave th
I would just add that JSR-311 might also be an option.
As an aside (and since you folks are on the Expert Group), do we
know if
JAX-RS will be under a suitable specification license, or has Sun
encumbered
it as they have other Sun-led specifications?
We don't know. We won't implement JSR
Felix Meschberger wrote:
> As Alex also pointed out, the goal is to have a flexible framework to
> allow for different bindings.
Ah, that was not clear from the proposal. I thought that you were planning
to define your own, new, component model for delivering the content back to
the requestor.
On Aug 6, 2007, at 9:49 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the SDO
Java 1.0-incubating release. The vote thread is here ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg21169.html
+1
---
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:02 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Robert,
I uploaded fixed versions to:
http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.1-incubator_take3
The ONLY changes are:
1) Fixed the file names on the .asc files for the eclipse plugin so
the
signatures will validate correctly. (workaro
Am Donnerstag, den 09.08.2007, 09:27 -0700 schrieb Eelco Hillenius:
> > I would like to propose a new Apache project named Sling. The proposal
> > text is attached to this message and can also be found at [1].
>
> +1.
Thanks :-)
> It seems to be primarily focussed on content delivery, not so muc
Hi Noel,
> Seems to me that you might want to consider a binding for JSR-286 Portlets
> (using the Event mechanism to deliver the content to be rendered), rather
> than create a totally new UI component framework. I can't see any reason
> why the nested includes would be an issue.
>
> Just a tho
