Re: [docs] Release Distribution

On Jan 2, 2008 11:24 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: probably best to choose one and then change all instances [-1] www.apache.org/dist/incubator/podling [+1] www.apache.org/dist/incubator/empodling/em [+1]

Re: [docs] Release Distribution

On Jan 2, 2008 11:24 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: snip spelling out that http://archive.apache.org/dist location would be nice. where? (or just dive in and patch) :) I have a couple other sites open at the moment and too many active

Re: [docs] Release Distribution

On Jan 2, 2008 10:33 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 2, 2008 4:39 AM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: i've taken a stab at a first draft of documenting release distribution

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator

On Jan 5, 2008, at 9:27 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote: [x] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation Andrus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [DISCUSSION] BlueSky Proposal

It is very nice. Impove both language and technical skills. On Jan 6, 2008 1:58 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/5/08, Ting Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently, most of our developers are not native speaker of English. We have some difficulties to communicate in

Re: [VOTE] publish Tika 0.1-incubating

On Jan 3, 2008 8:09 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Jan 4, 2008 5:31 AM, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for this release, and note to developers to have a DISCLAIMER file separately in both source release and the META-INF dir of the binary. Will do. On a

Re: [docs] Release Distribution

On Jan 2, 2008 10:33 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 2, 2008 4:39 AM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: snip Could you rephrase the term top level subdirectory to something that isn't self-contradictory? ;-) Just dropping the

Re: [doc] Guides verses Policy

On Dec 29, 2007 4:39 PM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: recent experience suggests that the incubator documentation does a poor job of helping podlings understand the difference between guides and policy the first section in

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator

Well said. +1 to Acceptt BlueSky for Incubation Alex On Jan 5, 2008 7:03 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] +1 Accept BlueSky for incubation I've read the discussion on the proposal and share the concerns voiced. But the incubator exists to mitigate those concerns, not

[docs] project.xml - mentor [WAS Re: [POLICY] Streamline Setting+Up+a+New+Podling policy]

On Jan 1, 2008 4:58 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 31, 2007 9:14 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip There is a guide http://incubator.apache.org/guides/projects.html that could be used for the purpose. It's (strangely) linked from the left navbar

Re: [docs] Release Distribution

Hi Robert, changes are good, both for the directory stuff and the dealing with a defect section. cheers, Roland - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [doc] Guides verses Policy

Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: i've added something along these lines to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/index.html. i've also added a note explaining that questions on deviations may be expected. Looks good to me. cheers, Roland

Re: [doc] Guides verses Policy

On Jan 6, 2008 6:20 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 29, 2007 4:39 PM, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: recent experience suggests that the incubator documentation does a poor job of helping podlings understand the difference

Re: [docs] Release Distribution

On Jan 6, 2008 2:01 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 2, 2008 11:24 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: probably best to choose one and then change all instances [-1] www.apache.org/dist/incubator/podling [+1]

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator

+1 (non-binding). Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org; Ting Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 11:27 AM Subject: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator Thanks to everyone who made

REMINDER: Board Reports Due THIS Week

Yes, yes, it seems early, but that's what happens when the 1st is a Tuesday. :-) All Board reports are due this week. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bluesky Project into the Incubator

Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks to everyone who made contributions to this proposal and special thanks to Niclas and Aaron for stepping up as mentors. The project is documented here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky Please vote on accepting Bluesky into the Apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Bennu, a Router, Firewall Wi-Fi perimeter

as a follow up ... I did add the following child pages to the Bennu proposal draft in December 2007 as a result of feedback I got from others: * /BennuBackgroundInfo (was part of the initial proposal) * /BennuFaq * /BennuMissionStatement Noel J. Bergman wrote: I spoke with Cliff Skolnick

Re: [VOTE] publish Tika 0.1-incubating

Hi Craig: Thanks for the +1. Incubator PMC, anyone else out there? :) Thanks! Cheers, Chris On 1/1/08 3:07 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 to release. I verified the signature and ran RAT on the artifacts. No issues. A few notes: 0. Good work for your first

Re: [VOTE] publish Tika 0.1-incubating

Hi, On Jan 7, 2008 3:54 AM, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the +1. Incubator PMC, anyone else out there? :) Did you check the general@ archives (I recall you aren't subscribed)? We already have enough votes for the release. Will you tally the results, or should I? BR,