SUBMISSION TYPE: TSU
SUBMITTED BY: Jukka Zitting
SUBMITTED FOR:The Apache Software Foundation
POINT OF CONTACT: Secretary, The Apache Software Foundation
FAX: +1-410-803-2258
MANUFACTURER(S): The Apache Software Foundation, Bouncy Castle
PRODUCT
That finished with "BUILD SUCCESSFUL".
The errors I reported were when I was running plain mvn from the
top-level directory, which is what the vote e-mail said to do.
Are the missing artifacts due to a Maven bug or a bug in the
configuration or something else?
On 25/01/2008, Luciano Resende <[E
Could you please try to build itest/osgi-implementation with a "mvn -U
clean install" and see if you still have issues. I just tried and it
completed successfully even with all felix artifacts removed from my
local maven repo.
On Jan 25, 2008 3:11 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 25/01/2
On 25/01/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got a couple of failures when trying to build the Tuscany 1.1 source.
>
> The first time, I got an out of memory error from Java.
>
> I'm assuming this was due to the hundreds of jar and digest files that
> were downloaded (at least 760 jar+digest)
We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This version
is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3 fixing over
50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered during some
interop testing.
For a full list of the issues, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jir
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> Normally, I would suggest that if we have people wanting to work on a
> project, that we bring it back to life here.
I'm curious how this is supposed to happen? We recently had
two independent inquiries [1,2] of people wanting to work on
a failed incubator project calle
I got a couple of failures when trying to build the Tuscany 1.1 source.
The first time, I got an out of memory error from Java.
I'm assuming this was due to the hundreds of jar and digest files that
were downloaded (at least 760 jar+digest), as the error did not occur
the second time. Possibly th
On 25/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > Hi sebb
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the detai
On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > Hi sebb
> > >
> > > Thank you for the detailed review.
> > >
> > > Can you tell me what you mean by
> > >
> > >
On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi sebb
> >
> > Thank you for the detailed review.
> >
> > Can you tell me what you mean by
> >
> > On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 24/01/2008,
10 matches
Mail list logo