RE: Subversion vs other source control systems

2008-02-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Santiago Gala wrote: Noel J. Bergman escribió: No project was allowed to stay with CVS. No project will be allowed to use another source control system unless it is adopted at the ASF level. Source code is a critical, shared, public resource maintained by the Foundation, not something

RE: Subversion vs other source control systems

2008-02-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: I understand that GiT can be used locally as a layer on top of SVN. I believe this gives you most of the perceived benefits of GiT locally without the need for a project itself to switch to GiT. The issue isn't git as an SVN client. No one

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

2008-02-17 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Feb 17, 2008 7:51 AM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But visibility of the content and process very much IS part of the Apache Way. Most of the use cases mentioned so far for git, including some where people are using it on top of SVN with ASF projects, run counter to ASF

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

2008-02-17 Thread Leo Simons
On Feb 17, 2008, at 4:51 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Most of the use cases mentioned so far for git, including some where people are using it on top of SVN with ASF projects, run counter to ASF principles. Let me fix that: Use case: work on apache project while on plane

xmlbeanscxx project revival

2008-02-17 Thread Rafal Rusin
Hello, There is an ongoing development of xmlbeanscxx at TouK side, because of needs for this project. We are willing to provide our recently released version to Apache. We are also aiming at releasing version 1.0. There are 2 things left to implement to version 1.0: XPath evaluation and

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

2008-02-17 Thread Santiago Gala
El dom, 17-02-2008 a las 19:12 +0100, Leo Simons escribió: On Feb 17, 2008, at 4:51 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Most of the use cases mentioned so far for git, including some where people are using it on top of SVN with ASF projects, run counter to ASF principles. Let me fix that:

RE: Subversion vs other source control systems

2008-02-17 Thread Santiago Gala
El dom, 17-02-2008 a las 10:58 -0500, Noel J. Bergman escribió: Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: I understand that GiT can be used locally as a layer on top of SVN. I believe this gives you most of the perceived benefits of GiT locally without the need for a project

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

2008-02-17 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Feb 17, 2008 3:34 PM, Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also: you keep a long term branch for doing some refactoring, and you fix small bugs both in HEAD and in a release branch, merging and backporting/forwardporting as you go. Again, something like git makes the work simpler and

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

2008-02-17 Thread Assaf Arkin
On 2/17/08, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But visibility of the content and process very much IS part of the Apache Way. Most of the use cases mentioned so far for git, including some where people are using it on top of SVN with ASF projects, run counter to ASF principles. It is