Davanum Srinivas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl,
Do they *all* have CCLA's?
absolutely.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 04.03.2008, at 20:27, Carl Trieloff wrote:
sebb wrote:
...
>RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Qpid Project be and
>hereby is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws
intended
>to encourage open development and increased
participation in
>the Qpid
Well, a quick svn log on their SVN repo for all commits since Jan 1 and
some google/"linked in" searches yields: (disclaimer: I could be wrong
on some of these, it was a quick search, people may no longer be with
these companies, etc...)
Committer Company #Commits
Aidan Skinner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl,
Do they *all* have CCLA's?
- -- dims
Scott Deboy wrote:
| I'm curious what other incubator folks think about qpid's plan for disclosing
the organizational diversity of their
committership/PMC (or if this is even a requirement).
|
| Scott Deb
I'm curious what other incubator folks think about qpid's plan for disclosing
the organizational diversity of their committership/PMC (or if this is even a
requirement).
Scott Deboy
COMOTIV SYSTEMS
111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950
Portland, OR 97201
Telephone: 503.224.7496
Cell:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
This would be Qpid's month to report -- Should we create one, or just
continue the graduation thread and
if we pass the vote, take the resolution to the board, if the vote does
not pass report next month?
Please report, that report will be a good backgrounder for the boa
yea, you are right, me got it wrong in my head.
Carl.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Carl,
According to:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
Qpid isn't support to report till April.
Dan
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Needless to say, it i
sebb wrote:
On 04/03/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote:
> On 29/02/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Craig L Russell wrote:
>> Comments on last version ..
>>
>> - It looks like you are using a non-applicable template for the board
>>
Carl,
According to:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
Qpid isn't support to report till April.
Dan
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Carl Trieloff wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Needless to say, it is that time again, when Incubator Reports march
> > towards their inevitable mee
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Needless to say, it is that time again, when Incubator Reports march towards
their inevitable meeting with the Board.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 12:12 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Saturday 01 March 2008 22:18, sebb wrote:
> > None of the mentors seem to be included.
> > Perhaps this is normal for graduating podling
Needless to say, it is that time again, when Incubator Reports march towards
their inevitable meeting with the Board.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On 04/03/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 29/02/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Craig L Russell wrote:
> >> Comments on last version ..
> >>
> >> - It looks like you are using a non-applicable template for the board
> >> resolution. T
Here's an idea from the Commons list that seemed attractive there and
I'd like to ask what people think here.
Commons has the Commons Sandbox, which while it's often been viewed as
Incubator-like is actually much more like Labs. New code is written or
pieced together from many sources and then rel
Just noticed while looking at the QPid page that the license bit says:
"Check and make sure that all source code distributed by the project
is covered by one or more of the following approved licenses: Apache,
BSD, Artistic, MIT/X, MIT/W3C, MPL 1.1, or something with essentially
the same terms. "
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 12:12 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > On Saturday 01 March 2008 22:18, sebb wrote:
> > > None of the mentors seem to be included.
> > > Perhaps this is normal for graduating podlings?
> >
> > Ofte
sebb wrote:
On 29/02/2008, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Comments on last version ..
- It looks like you are using a non-applicable template for the board
resolution. Take a look at other incubator graduation resolutions.
- Specifically, the paragraph on establishing bylaws isn'
Luciano Resende wrote:
Have you guys been following the Graduation Guide [1][2], I was
checking the status page [3] for getting information around QPid and
it seems outdated.
yes, I used the guide and we completed a process to clean up Karma and
updated the status page a few weeks ago. Cliff
18 matches
Mail list logo
