[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12613032#action_12613032
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on INCUBATOR-77:
--
Ping. Any progress on the headers?
Noel,
I've fixed the wording on the wiki text to clear up the initial committers:
We've been talking with the storage group at HP, haven't approached
the others yet, but would certainly welcome them.
Thanks!
Dave
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TashiProposal
***
David,
I just reviewed ht
On Jul 11, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Jim,
2008/7/11 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
And I am forced to agree as well... To be honest, I still at times
question exactly the "relationship" between the ASF and Maven is.
It's no surprise that Maven chomps at the bit quite a bit
On 7/11/08, chen chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to ask some questions about "Updating the the top-level Incubator
> website".
Cool
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report
> a. Is it that every page of Incubator website(
> http://incubator.apache
2008/7/12 Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So let's approach it in an open source way
> - try to persuade Maven committers to pay attention and/or contribute the
> code to fix the problem.
Thanks Andrus - this is certainly the best thing anyone can do. It's
unfortunate that there hasn't been
Hi Jim,
2008/7/11 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And I am forced to agree as well... To be honest, I still at times
> question exactly the "relationship" between the ASF and Maven is.
> It's no surprise that Maven chomps at the bit quite a bit regarding
> ASF policies, but values the "Apache
2008/7/11 Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But we could also say the fact that "CXF is in the Incubator" also
> prevented people from migrating, or discouraged attracting
> committers...
I've heard that stated before and I think it's something the podlings
should be keeping in mind.
> IMO, th
I want to ask some questions about "Updating the the top-level Incubator
website".
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report
a. Is it that every page of Incubator website(
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/bluesky.html) and Official website(
http://incubator
On Jul 11, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
but I don't think ASF policies apply to the architecture decisions
(good or bad) and development direction of any given project.
They don't. Sorry if that wasn't clear :)
Yep. That's where I was getting. You can ignore my last message the
The two are different things. I agree about the technical problem (and
can add a dozen of other Maven-related things that drive me crazy as a
user). I don't agree that ignoring this problem by the Maven folks
constitutes a violation of some Apache policy. So let's approach it in
an open sou
but I don't think ASF policies apply to the architecture decisions
(good or bad) and development direction of any given project.
They don't. Sorry if that wasn't clear :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addi
On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Hi Jim,
It's no surprise that Maven chomps at the bit quite a bit regarding
ASF policies, but values the "Apache brand" enough to tow the
line.
Did you mean Maven as "Maven repo deployed @Apache" or "Maven the
PMC"? As Noel was talking s
Hi Jim,
It's no surprise that Maven chomps at the bit quite a bit regarding
ASF policies, but values the "Apache brand" enough to tow the
line.
Did you mean Maven as "Maven repo deployed @Apache" or "Maven the
PMC"? As Noel was talking specifically about the PMC. We can certainly
ban Maven
On Jul 7, 2008, at 11:06 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Again, Are u stating that removing this restriction would have
reduced
the time taken to graduate from 2 years to 1 year?
We'll never know. It certainly affected some of the features we
concentrated on and thus may or may not have affected
On Jul 9, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I am forced to agree with Roy on these points. Until the Maven PMC
stops
abrogating its responsibility and addresses the issues, there does not
appear to be anything that we can do about Maven's flaws short of
banning
use of the public
Thanks!
16 matches
Mail list logo
