[VOTE] Accept Click for Incubation

2008-07-14 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
This vote will run until Monday, July 21st, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept Click for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: = Click Proposal = This proposal specifies the migration of Click web application framework to the Apache Software Foundation as a Top

Re: [VOTE] Accept Click for Incubation

2008-07-14 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi folks, Had a look at Click and really like it ... :-) .. therefore [X] +1 Accept Click for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: If you need to tackle a Maven build I can lend a hand ... :-) Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: This

Incubator Board Report July 2008

2008-07-14 Thread Noel J. Bergman
July 2008 Board Incubator Report THE major topic of discussion has continued to be the Maven repository. A thread, Do we really need an incubator?, was started by Dims, but the real issue raised was over the perceived watering down of Incubator seperation as a consequence of Maven's repository

Re: [PROPOSAL] Tashi

2008-07-14 Thread Matthieu Riou
Hi, I've reviewed the proposal as well, sounds pretty interesting. I have a couple of additional questions: * The sponsoring entity is the Incubator so I'm guessing you're shooting for graduating as a TLP. What kind of interactions do you foresee with Hadoop for example? * IIC Tashi is only

Re: svn commit: r676177

2008-07-14 Thread Bernd Fondermann
Hi, I am concerned about the recent commit from the BlueSky project, recorded as revision 676177. This bulk commit looks to me like GPLed code from a third party project has been taken, being modified to obfuscate the origins of this code and then being committed to svn without any prior IP

Re: Reminder: July Reports are due

2008-07-14 Thread Jorg Heymans
On 14 Jul 2008, at 05:40, Craig L Russell wrote: On Jul 13, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Craig Russell wrote: I guess I missed the update on the process. What update? We've been using the Wiki to accumulate these reports since pretty much the beginning. I've been

Re: [VOTE] Accept Click for Incubation

2008-07-14 Thread Andrus Adamchik
+1 On Jul 14, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: This vote will run until Monday, July 21st, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept Click for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: = Click Proposal = This proposal specifies the migration of Click web

BlueSky clouded? (was: Re: svn commit: r676177)

2008-07-14 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
Last time I looked, GTK, which is at the core of the code that I looked at, is under LGPL, which is explicitly banned from Apache Projects: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html Which licenses may NOT be included within Apache products? [...] * GNU LGPL 2, 2.1, 3 So this means, that

Re: [VOTE] Accept Click for Incubation

2008-07-14 Thread Eelco Hillenius
[ x ] +1 Accept Click for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: BlueSky clouded? (was: Re: svn commit: r676177)

2008-07-14 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Bernd Fondermann wrote: I just noticed that BlueSky did not report anything since being voted into incubation in January and is not linked from the incubator website. Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Last time I looked, GTK, which is at the core of the code that I looked at, is under LGPL,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Click for Incubation

2008-07-14 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
+1 Regards, Alan On Jul 14, 2008, at 4:14 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: This vote will run until Monday, July 21st, 2008. [ ] +1 Accept Click for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason: = Click Proposal = This proposal specifies the migration