+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 14, 2008, at 4:14 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, July 21st, 2008.
[ ] +1 Accept Click for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
= Click Proposal =
This proposal specifies the migration o
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> I just noticed that BlueSky did not report anything since being voted
> into incubation in January and is not linked from the incubator
> website.
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> Last time I looked, GTK, which is at the core of the code that I looked
> at, is under LGPL
[ x ] +1 Accept Click for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last time I looked, GTK, which is at the core of the code that I looked
at, is under LGPL, which is explicitly banned from Apache Projects:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
Which licenses may NOT be included within Apache products?
[...]
* GNU LGPL 2, 2.1, 3
So this means, that *
+1
On Jul 14, 2008, at 2:14 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, July 21st, 2008.
[ ] +1 Accept Click for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
= Click Proposal =
This proposal specifies the migration of Click web appl
On 14 Jul 2008, at 05:40, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Jul 13, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Craig Russell wrote:
I guess I missed the update on the process.
What update? We've been using the Wiki to accumulate these reports
since
pretty much the beginning.
I've been sendin
Hi,
I am concerned about the recent commit from the BlueSky project,
recorded as revision 676177.
This bulk commit looks to me like GPLed code from a third party
project has been taken, being modified to obfuscate the origins of
this code and then being committed to svn without any prior IP
clear
Hi,
I've reviewed the proposal as well, sounds pretty interesting. I have a
couple of additional questions:
* The sponsoring entity is the Incubator so I'm guessing you're shooting
for graduating as a TLP. What kind of interactions do you foresee with
Hadoop for example?
* IIC Tashi is only a
July 2008 Board Incubator Report
THE major topic of discussion has continued to be the Maven repository. A
thread, "Do we really need an incubator?", was started by Dims, but the real
issue raised was over the perceived watering down of Incubator seperation as
a consequence of Maven's repository
Hi folks,
Had a look at Click and really like it ... :-) .. therefore
[X] +1 Accept Click for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
If you need to tackle a Maven build I can lend a hand ... :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
This vote
This vote will run until Monday, July 21st, 2008.
[ ] +1 Accept Click for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
= Click Proposal =
This proposal specifies the migration of Click web application framework
to the Apache Software Foundation as a Top Level
11 matches
Mail list logo