Re: [VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator

2008-12-28 Thread Ian Holsman
Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: getting non-FB contributors to contribute. Isn't this an oxymoron? c/contribute/re-contribute/ Cheers Niclas - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator

2008-12-28 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Ian Holsman wrote: > getting non-FB contributors to contribute. Isn't this an oxymoron? Cheers Niclas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator

2008-12-28 Thread Ian Holsman
Hi Martijn. The major bottleneck with the FB devs in the repository is that they are using a separate one internally for their development and then refactoring it for public use. Prashant has committed to using the public repository in the future. (see thread "get a cold and miss all the fun")

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator

2008-12-28 Thread Martijn Dashorst
My concern is that though the original FB devs told that they wanted to move to apache, they are (according to what I've read here) silent again. The discussions on the original list did not show a trust in a community without the Facebook devs. Futhermore, from what I've read on the original list

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator (Summary)

2008-12-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 Brian's response clarified the situation for me. On 28-Dec-08, at 7:29 PM, Ian Holsman wrote: After 5 days, the following is the vote summary of the binding votes (apologies if I missed your vote in advance). +1: (5) Brian, Ian, Otis, Dims, Emmanuel +0: (2) Bertrand, Torsten -1: (1) Nicl

[VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator (Summary)

2008-12-28 Thread Ian Holsman
After 5 days, the following is the vote summary of the binding votes (apologies if I missed your vote in advance). +1: (5) Brian, Ian, Otis, Dims, Emmanuel +0: (2) Bertrand, Torsten -1: (1) Niclas ?: Jason, Martijn, Matthieu (commented but no vote) The only concern on the voting process was th