Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Chemistry

Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Anyway, looking deeper I found "Chemistry Development Kit", a Java > project that already has a clear claim to the name so I guess we need > to keep looking. I contacted the Chemistry Development Kit people and asked [1] for their feedb

RE: Getting Log4PHP going again.

Hi All, Well things seem to be dying down here, ApacheCon well and truly over, board meeting is done and this thread celebrates 1 month today :) So, just checking in, can we do something about this Log4PHP revival ? Thanks Gav... > -Original Message- > From: Gavin [mailto:ga...@16degr

Apache Wink Proposal

Hello all, I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for Apache Wink, stand-alone REST toolkit supporting JAX-RS (JSR 311), a client runtime and test cases (as well as other items). The full proposal can be found on the wiki at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WinkProposal . We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

It has been a week since I sent this request for a VOTE. Craig and sebb have reviewed it. Would really appreciate if someone else can take a look and vote. sebb - if you are satisfied with the responses to your questions, can you please vote ? Thanks Shanti Original Message

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote: > On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote: > > > On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote: > > > > > Thank you very much for your very prompt review. > > > Answers to your questions below. > > > > > > Shanti > > > > > > sebb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The Ol

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

We're adding JAX-RS support in Tuscany to provide the RESTful services in SCA. The contributed prototype [1] is based on Jersey. Having an Apache licensed JAX-WS implementation would be a good fit for us. Thanks, Raymond [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2919 --

RE: Apache Wink Proposal

Fixed - thanks... The other IBM "No's" are scheduled to get CLAs. Regards... Greg Greg Truty WebSphere Web Services and REST Architect, IBM Austin EMail: gtr...@us.ibm.com Phone: (ext) (512) 286-8985 (Tie) 363-8985 From: "Peltz, Christopher" To: Greg Truty/Austin/i...

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

You mean JAX-RS implementation. In that case, you can use either Apache CXF or Apache Wink... Having multiple implementations will validate pluggability too. Regards... Greg Greg Truty WebSphere Web Services and REST Architect, IBM Austin EMail: gtr...@us.ibm.com Phone: (ext) (512) 2

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

On Wed April 22 2009 1:07:39 pm Greg Truty wrote: > Hello all, I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for > Apache Wink, stand-alone REST toolkit supporting JAX-RS (JSR 311), a > client runtime and test cases (as well as other items). The full proposal > can be found on the wiki at

Re: [VOTE] Olio 0.1 Release

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: > Can anyone else please take a look at the Olio podling release? +1 (after consulting thread below) a little feedback to pass on: OlioDriver.jar does not contain LICENSE and NOTICE. it should not be distributed indepedently (for example,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote: > It has been a week since I sent this request for a VOTE. Craig and sebb have > reviewed it. > Would really appreciate if someone else can take a look and vote. i've just taken a look and it looks ok to me but i'd like to hear the

how do you find a Champion?

According to , "a Champion should be found before the proposal is formally submitted." My question is... how do you find one? Is emailing general@incubator.apache.org, saying "hi - I'm looking for a Champion for " sufficient?

RE: Apache Wink Proposal

Greg - one correction - HP did sign an Apache CLA, so it should say "Yes", next to all HP initial committers. From: Greg Truty [gtr...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:07 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Nicholas L Gallardo; Dustin Amrhein; Br

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

Dan, I do think that "graduating" via a merger with the CXF implementation and engagements with that community is a good goal to have. I believe we call that out explicitly since we tell all projects that when the time is ripe we can figure out where the project is gonna live. So +1 for that optio

Re: Is SVN considered a Release? (was: [VOTE] Release Apache Pivot 1.1 (second try))

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote: > On 17/04/2009, ant elder wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: >>  >> And that matches "What is a release?" in the ASF Releases FAQ (although >> SVN >>  >> its not explicitly mentioned): >> http://www.apache.org/dev/

Re: how do you find a Champion?

On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 14:04 -0500, Thomas Anderson wrote: > According to > , > "a Champion should be found before the proposal is formally > submitted." My question is... how do you find one? Is emailing > general@incubator.apa

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

Dan, Let me address both your comments, and then your questions. - Both IBM and HP EACH have an implementation of a REST runtime. We are bringing both. Speaking for the IBM portion, yes - we have something which is already compliant. Apache CXF is both a JAX-WS and JAX-RS implementation. I

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > So, basically, you wanted a JAX-RS implementation. You looked at Apache > CXF Just to make matters more muddy .. Axis2 has full REST support and there's some work that was started to support JAX-RS but never completed (not exactly major

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

> Apache CXF is both a JAX-WS and JAX-RS > implementation. In IBM, our JAX-WS implementation is based on Apache > Axis2. Therefore, it was prohibitive to pull in CXF as part of our > runtime. IBM wanted/needed something smaller - it's as simple as that. ... > My question back to you is, do

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

Dan, - So we have basically 3 parties at the table with their own code. - Yes, we would love to get CXF folks involved, it was a mistake not to have done that earlier. - Obviously we are not going to move all the discussion over to cxf and drop the proposal as there is code from HP as well. So my

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

Thanks Sanjiva - you are correct that the original IBM intent was a clean JAX-RS runtime. There's not that much code in the JAX-RS APIs demanding much more else than that. With HP - as stated - it's been developed over a number of years. I want to make sure folks realize that the convergence

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

> If you would have asked the CXF community, we would have been happy to tell > you that the JAX-RS implementation has NO DEPENDENCIES on the JAX-WS > implementation.There is a CXF "core" with various personalities layered on > top. JAX-WS is one personality.JAX-RS is another. (there a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote: On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote: On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote: On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote: Thank you very much for your very prompt review. Answers to your questions below. Shanti sebb wrote: The OlioDriver.jar file contain

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

On 23/04/2009, at 3:59 AM, Peltz, Christopher wrote: Greg - one correction - HP did sign an Apache CLA, so it should say "Yes", next to all HP initial committers. That's not correct - each still requires an individual CLA if they are going to participate in the project. I think you are thi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote: > On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote: > > > On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE > wrote: > > > > > On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much for your very

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

sebb wrote: On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote: On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote: On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote: On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote: On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote: Thank you very much for your very

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote: > sebb wrote: > > > On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE > wrote: > > > > > > > On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 04/15/09 18:1

Suggestion regarding improvement of iCLA submission process

The current CLA submission process is described here: http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#cla-registration I'd like to make a suggestion that emails be sent to people to submitting iCLAs so that they have idea of the status of their submission. I'd suggest sending emails when an iCLA has bee

Re: Suggestion regarding improvement of iCLA submission process

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Richard Hirsch wrote: > The current CLA submission process is described here: > http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#cla-registration > > I'd like to make a suggestion that emails be sent to people to submitting > iCLAs so that they have idea of the status of

Re: Suggestion regarding improvement of iCLA submission process

I like the idea of using JIRA to track the iCLA status. It is already possible to submit attachments with Jira items, so that would deal with submissions by email. For mailed and faxed submissions, I could imagine volunteers scanning these items, adding them to Jira and then mailing the submitter t